Federalized Two-step Migration in Quebec: An Ambiguous Process of Inclusion

Abstract In federal states, immigration regulation is frequently shared with subnational levels of governance. In Canada, provinces even have immigration selection powers. This is significant, as an increasing proportion of new permanent residents (1) are now selected by a province, and (2) previously held a temporary residence permit. However, the ways in which the interaction between the federalization of immigration and two-step migration impacts migrants’ experiences is still not well understood. This article contributes to the literature by providing deeper insights into the effects of the federalization of immigration on migrants. Based on the case of Quebec, it analyzes how the federalization of two-step migration affects migrants’ transitions from temporary to permanent status, whereby immigrants become “included.” The article contends that rather than functioning as an administrative process of linear inclusion, the federalization of two-step migration produces an ambiguous process of inclusion which reflects contradictory federal-provincial political agendas and tensions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Canadian Journal of Political Science
Published
2025-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/s0008423924000660
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Social Sciences and Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
18.53
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Federalized Two-step Migration in Quebec: An Ambiguous Process of Inclusion

Capucine Coustere, Danièle Bélanger, Charles Fleury
3 citations
Canadian Journal of Political Science
Social Sciences and Governance
18.53
article

Federalized Two-step Migration in Quebec: An Ambiguous Process of Inclusion

Capucine Coustere, Danièle Bélanger, Charles Fleury
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Abstract In federal states, immigration regulation is frequently shared with subnational levels of governance. In Canada, provinces even have immigration selection powers. This is significant, as an increasing proportion of new permanent residents (1) are now selected by a province, and (2) previously held a temporary residence permit. However, the ways in which the interaction between the federalization of immigration and two-step migration impacts migrants’ experiences is still not well understood. This article contributes to the literature by providing deeper insights into the effects of the federalization of immigration on migrants. Based on the case of Quebec, it analyzes how the federalization of two-step migration affects migrants’ transitions from temporary to permanent status, whereby immigrants become “included.” The article contends that rather than functioning as an administrative process of linear inclusion, the federalization of two-step migration produces an ambiguous process of inclusion which reflects contradictory federal-provincial political agendas and tensions.

Canadian Journal of Political ScienceVol. 58(1)
Université Laval (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Social Sciences and Governance
18.53
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.