Artificial Intelligence Evidence: Concepts, Nature and Applications

Artificial intelligence (AI) has been widely applied in assisting judicial proceedings, but there remains some ambiguity and controversy regarding the use of machine opinions generated by AI as criminal evidence. AI evidence refers to materials formed through the use of AI to analyze and produce opinions such as voice recognition, image recognition, natural language processing, and expert systems, which are then used to prove case facts. It is characterized by generativeness, informativeness, and complexity. AI evidence is distinct from big data evidence and algorithmic evidence, as it manifests in the application of technologies like facial recognition, intelligent trajectory analysis, and generative AI in criminal cases. The admissibility of AI evidence can be judged based on its objectivity and legality, while its probative force can be analyzed in terms of relevance and admissibility. AI evidence should not be automatically categorized into existing statutory types of evidence, but rather, a miscellaneous provision could be added to the existing categories of statutory evidence. The review of AI evidence should involve improving the disclosure system and expert testimony rules, as well as drawing on the rules of corroboration, to ultimately promote a more scientific and widespread application of AI evidence in the judicial field.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Humanities and Social Sciences
Published
2025-05-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.54691/6g9r5911
Primary Topic
Digital and Cyber Forensics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Artificial Intelligence Evidence: Concepts, Nature and Applications

Chenxin Li
Frontiers in Humanities and Social Sciences
Digital and Cyber Forensics
article

Artificial Intelligence Evidence: Concepts, Nature and Applications

Chenxin Li
article en

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) has been widely applied in assisting judicial proceedings, but there remains some ambiguity and controversy regarding the use of machine opinions generated by AI as criminal evidence. AI evidence refers to materials formed through the use of AI to analyze and produce opinions such as voice recognition, image recognition, natural language processing, and expert systems, which are then used to prove case facts. It is characterized by generativeness, informativeness, and complexity. AI evidence is distinct from big data evidence and algorithmic evidence, as it manifests in the application of technologies like facial recognition, intelligent trajectory analysis, and generative AI in criminal cases. The admissibility of AI evidence can be judged based on its objectivity and legality, while its probative force can be analyzed in terms of relevance and admissibility. AI evidence should not be automatically categorized into existing statutory types of evidence, but rather, a miscellaneous provision could be added to the existing categories of statutory evidence. The review of AI evidence should involve improving the disclosure system and expert testimony rules, as well as drawing on the rules of corroboration, to ultimately promote a more scientific and widespread application of AI evidence in the judicial field.

Frontiers in Humanities and Social SciencesVol. 5(5)
Beijing Normal University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 85%
Digital and Cyber Forensics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.