Phonological biases in lexical access in French and German: Data from a familiar word-recognition conflict task

Consonants have been proposed to be more important than vowels in lexical processes (i.e., C-bias). This study investigated the existence and strength of the C-bias using a familiar word recognition conflict task, in which recognition takes place in the context of a conflict between consonantal and vocalic information. This was evaluated using eye-tracking in two linguistic populations (French and German) and two age groups (adults and 24-month-old toddlers). The experiment tested the recognition of a target object among two familiar objects presented on a screen. In the control condition, the auditory stimulus corresponded to one of the objects presented. In the conflict condition, the stimulus differed from the name of one of the objects by a consonant and from the other by a vowel. In the control condition, word recognition was found in all groups. In the conflict condition, contrary to our predictions, we failed to find evidence of a C-bias in both French- and German-speaking participants, at both ages. Rather, the analyses revealed phonological similarity effects on participants' lexical access, which varied across languages but were similar across ages. In French, word recognition was sensitive to phonological distance, with a looking preference for the familiar words with less feature changes from the mispronounced words. In German, word recognition was sensitive to the rhyme, with a looking preference for the familiar words rhyming with the mispronounced words. We discuss these findings in terms of task-specific effects and speculate about why a C-bias was not elicited in the current study.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Infant Behavior and Development
Published
2025-05-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infbeh.2025.102070
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Language Development and Disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.44
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Phonological biases in lexical access in French and German: Data from a familiar word-recognition conflict task

Leonardo Piot, Thierry Nazzi, Natalie Boll‐Avetisyan, Silvana Schmandt et al.
1 citations
Infant Behavior and Development
Language Development and Disorders
3.44
article

Phonological biases in lexical access in French and German: Data from a familiar word-recognition conflict task

Leonardo Piot, Thierry Nazzi, Natalie Boll‐Avetisyan, Silvana Schmandt, Sandrien van Ommen
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Consonants have been proposed to be more important than vowels in lexical processes (i.e., C-bias). This study investigated the existence and strength of the C-bias using a familiar word recognition conflict task, in which recognition takes place in the context of a conflict between consonantal and vocalic information. This was evaluated using eye-tracking in two linguistic populations (French and German) and two age groups (adults and 24-month-old toddlers). The experiment tested the recognition of a target object among two familiar objects presented on a screen. In the control condition, the auditory stimulus corresponded to one of the objects presented. In the conflict condition, the stimulus differed from the name of one of the objects by a consonant and from the other by a vowel. In the control condition, word recognition was found in all groups. In the conflict condition, contrary to our predictions, we failed to find evidence of a C-bias in both French- and German-speaking participants, at both ages. Rather, the analyses revealed phonological similarity effects on participants' lexical access, which varied across languages but were similar across ages. In French, word recognition was sensitive to phonological distance, with a looking preference for the familiar words with less feature changes from the mispronounced words. In German, word recognition was sensitive to the rhyme, with a looking preference for the familiar words rhyming with the mispronounced words. We discuss these findings in terms of task-specific effects and speculate about why a C-bias was not elicited in the current study.

Infant Behavior and DevelopmentVol. 79
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), University of Potsdam (DE), Université Paris Cité (FR), University Hospital of Geneva (CH)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Language Development and Disorders
3.44
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.