The Silence of Numbers

Abstract The Chilean “miracle” during the Pinochet dictatorship is a modern-day chimera: with a gun in one hand and a monetarist stethoscope in the other, it rests on three foundations. The first involved the elimination of the opponents to the reforms. The junta was responsible for the assassinations of economists, forcing many others into exile. The second was the controversial support of the IMF and the World Bank, which provided financial assistance to service Chile’s external debt during the 1982 financial crisis, despite human rights violations. The third was the set of econometric instruments and indices that international observers and Chilean policymakers used to assess economic growth. This article delves into the intricacies of the so-called miracle, and in particular into this latter aspect that can be challenged from a feminist perspective. Data was scarce, biased, and limited during Pinochet’s era, but traditional indicators like GDP or national accounts were insufficient to account for the environmental and human costs of growth—a problem that was not specific to Chile but one underscored by the Chilean experience on a global scale.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Radical History Review
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1215/01636545-11506777
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Income, Poverty, and Inequality
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.20
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Silence of Numbers

Johanna Gautier Morin
1 citations
Radical History Review
Income, Poverty, and Inequality
4.20
article

The Silence of Numbers

Johanna Gautier Morin
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract The Chilean “miracle” during the Pinochet dictatorship is a modern-day chimera: with a gun in one hand and a monetarist stethoscope in the other, it rests on three foundations. The first involved the elimination of the opponents to the reforms. The junta was responsible for the assassinations of economists, forcing many others into exile. The second was the controversial support of the IMF and the World Bank, which provided financial assistance to service Chile’s external debt during the 1982 financial crisis, despite human rights violations. The third was the set of econometric instruments and indices that international observers and Chilean policymakers used to assess economic growth. This article delves into the intricacies of the so-called miracle, and in particular into this latter aspect that can be challenged from a feminist perspective. Data was scarce, biased, and limited during Pinochet’s era, but traditional indicators like GDP or national accounts were insufficient to account for the environmental and human costs of growth—a problem that was not specific to Chile but one underscored by the Chilean experience on a global scale.

Radical History ReviewVol. 2025(151)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Income, Poverty, and Inequality
4.20
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.