Nationwide longitudinal study reveals impact of both national restriction levels and genetic risk factors on loneliness during the COVID-19 pandemic

The impact of social restrictions during the COVID-19 pandemic on social isolation and loneliness has been widely debated, yet little attention has been given to identifying particularly vulnerable groups. In this study, we analysed data from 8,042 participants of the Danish Blood Donor Study (DBDS) through a prospective design with multiple follow-ups, integrating genetic, health, and socioeconomic information to identify distinct loneliness trajectories during the pandemic. Using the 3-item UCLA Loneliness Scale (UCLA-3), we found that self-reported loneliness increased in parallel with social restriction index, with women being particularly affected. We identified three distinct loneliness trajectories: high loneliness, pandemic loneliness, and low loneliness. Individuals in the high and pandemic loneliness trajectories both had higher polygenic scores (PGS) for loneliness and for the personality trait neuroticism compared to the low loneliness trajectory. The high loneliness trajectory was additionally associated with high PGS for psychiatric disorders and low PGS for the personality trait extraversion in addition to a higher proportion of pre-pandemic psychiatric disorder diagnoses. In contrast, the pandemic loneliness trajectory was linked to low PGS for the personality traits agreeableness and conscientiousness, as well as higher PGS for religious participation. These findings highlight the need for tailored interventions targeting individuals with poor mental well-being.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2025-05-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-02293-4
Primary Topic
Health disparities and outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Nationwide longitudinal study reveals impact of both national restriction levels and genetic risk factors on loneliness during the COVID-19 pandemic

Mie Topholm Bruun, Christina Mikkelsen, Lea Arregui Nordahl Christoffersen, Maria Didriksen et al.
Scientific Reports
Health disparities and outcomes
article

Nationwide longitudinal study reveals impact of both national restriction levels and genetic risk factors on loneliness during the COVID-19 pandemic

Mie Topholm Bruun, Christina Mikkelsen, Lea Arregui Nordahl Christoffersen, Maria Didriksen, Liam Quinn, Andrew J. Schork, Jakob Thaning Bay, Thomas Werge, Henrik Ullum, Ole Birger Pedersen, Sisse Rye Ostrowski, Bitten Aagaard, Janna Nissen, Khoa Manh Dinh, Christian Erikstrup
article en

Abstract

The impact of social restrictions during the COVID-19 pandemic on social isolation and loneliness has been widely debated, yet little attention has been given to identifying particularly vulnerable groups. In this study, we analysed data from 8,042 participants of the Danish Blood Donor Study (DBDS) through a prospective design with multiple follow-ups, integrating genetic, health, and socioeconomic information to identify distinct loneliness trajectories during the pandemic. Using the 3-item UCLA Loneliness Scale (UCLA-3), we found that self-reported loneliness increased in parallel with social restriction index, with women being particularly affected. We identified three distinct loneliness trajectories: high loneliness, pandemic loneliness, and low loneliness. Individuals in the high and pandemic loneliness trajectories both had higher polygenic scores (PGS) for loneliness and for the personality trait neuroticism compared to the low loneliness trajectory. The high loneliness trajectory was additionally associated with high PGS for psychiatric disorders and low PGS for the personality trait extraversion in addition to a higher proportion of pre-pandemic psychiatric disorder diagnoses. In contrast, the pandemic loneliness trajectory was linked to low PGS for the personality traits agreeableness and conscientiousness, as well as higher PGS for religious participation. These findings highlight the need for tailored interventions targeting individuals with poor mental well-being.

Scientific ReportsVol. 15(1)
Statens Serum Institut (DK), University of Copenhagen (DK), Aarhus University (DK), Aalborg University Hospital (DK), Mental Health Services (DK), Novo Nordisk Foundation (DK), Odense University Hospital (DK), Aarhus University Hospital (DK), Copenhagen University Hospital (DK), Rigshospitalet (DK), Zealand University Hospital Køge (DK)
Lundbeckfonden, NordForsk, H. Lundbeck A/S, Gillings School of Public Health
Openalex Percentile: Top 86%
Health disparities and outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.