“Thinking Manager, Thinking Man”: a Study on the Maintenance of Gender Stereotypes in the Processes of Women’s Promotion and Permanence in Leadership Positions

Objective: To understand the main challenges experienced by women workers in their career advancement as leaders in work organizations, based on the narratives of men and women leaders. Theoretical Framework: Gender inequality and machismo built in patriarchal society, which structure social relations in Brazil, have produced a movement of exclusion, exploitation and discrimination against women. In this scenario, some challenges and difficulties may arise for women in the workplace, which are expressed in the dissemination of gender stereotypes, in the absence of salary equity and career advancement policies, in the prejudices and acts of discrimination suffered by them. Method: This is a study with a quantitative-qualitative approach and of a descriptive nature. To achieve the aforementioned objective, a Leadership Questionnaire was applied to women leaders and men leaders, in order to find dissonances, consonances and therefore peculiarities of female leadership. The sample consisted of 105 responses from male leaders (n=48) and female leaders (n=57), 54.3% of whom were women who currently or have previously worked as leaders. Their challenges and difficulties are similar to those of male leaders, most of which are associated with people management, whether due to differences in teams or even daily interpersonal conflicts. Results and Discussion: Some female leaders pointed out as a challenge in their careers the ongoing process of prejudice in the form of moral and sexual harassment, as well as comments in meetings or the imposition of subtle barriers that impede their professional development. However, male leaders did not point out this challenge in their careers. Despite this, it seems that the naturalization of prejudices prevents their identification, generating a systemic and systematic process of denial of prejudice and reproduction of stereotypes. Research Implications: It is concluded that there have been important advances in female leadership, although permeated by challenges and difficulties brought about by gender stereotypes and prejudices. Women are taking on more responsibilities and advancing in their professional careers, but they continue to be primarily responsible for children and household chores. Originality/Value: It also points to the need for studies that consider intersectional aspects (gender, race/ethnicity and class) and the challenges of promoting equity, with the promotion of Diversity & Inclusion in social and work spaces.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Revista de Gestão Social e Ambiental
Published
2025-05-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.24857/rgsa.v19n5-078
Primary Topic
Gender Diversity and Inequality
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

“Thinking Manager, Thinking Man”: a Study on the Maintenance of Gender Stereotypes in the Processes of Women’s Promotion and Permanence in Leadership Positions

Mário Lázaro Camargo, Marianne Ramos Feijó, Amanda Pereira Freitas, Hugo Ferrari Cardoso et al.
Revista de Gestão Social e Ambiental
Gender Diversity and Inequality
article

“Thinking Manager, Thinking Man”: a Study on the Maintenance of Gender Stereotypes in the Processes of Women’s Promotion and Permanence in Leadership Positions

Mário Lázaro Camargo, Marianne Ramos Feijó, Amanda Pereira Freitas, Hugo Ferrari Cardoso, Vera Lúcia Messias Fialho Capellini
article en

Abstract

Objective: To understand the main challenges experienced by women workers in their career advancement as leaders in work organizations, based on the narratives of men and women leaders. Theoretical Framework: Gender inequality and machismo built in patriarchal society, which structure social relations in Brazil, have produced a movement of exclusion, exploitation and discrimination against women. In this scenario, some challenges and difficulties may arise for women in the workplace, which are expressed in the dissemination of gender stereotypes, in the absence of salary equity and career advancement policies, in the prejudices and acts of discrimination suffered by them. Method: This is a study with a quantitative-qualitative approach and of a descriptive nature. To achieve the aforementioned objective, a Leadership Questionnaire was applied to women leaders and men leaders, in order to find dissonances, consonances and therefore peculiarities of female leadership. The sample consisted of 105 responses from male leaders (n=48) and female leaders (n=57), 54.3% of whom were women who currently or have previously worked as leaders. Their challenges and difficulties are similar to those of male leaders, most of which are associated with people management, whether due to differences in teams or even daily interpersonal conflicts. Results and Discussion: Some female leaders pointed out as a challenge in their careers the ongoing process of prejudice in the form of moral and sexual harassment, as well as comments in meetings or the imposition of subtle barriers that impede their professional development. However, male leaders did not point out this challenge in their careers. Despite this, it seems that the naturalization of prejudices prevents their identification, generating a systemic and systematic process of denial of prejudice and reproduction of stereotypes. Research Implications: It is concluded that there have been important advances in female leadership, although permeated by challenges and difficulties brought about by gender stereotypes and prejudices. Women are taking on more responsibilities and advancing in their professional careers, but they continue to be primarily responsible for children and household chores. Originality/Value: It also points to the need for studies that consider intersectional aspects (gender, race/ethnicity and class) and the challenges of promoting equity, with the promotion of Diversity & Inclusion in social and work spaces.

Revista de Gestão Social e AmbientalVol. 19(5)
Openalex Percentile: Top 86%
Gender Diversity and Inequality
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.