Providers Consistently Delay Extubation after Successful Spontaneous Breathing Trials: A Retrospective Cohort Study

<b>Rationale:</b> Many patients who pass a spontaneous breathing trial (SBT) are not extubated, leaving them at risk for life-threatening ventilator-associated complications. Determining barriers to timely extubation may facilitate shorter overall durations of mechanical ventilation. <b>Objectives:</b> We sought to identify the patient-related and patient-independent barriers to timely extubation within 6 hours of passing an SBT. <b>Methods:</b> We analyzed electronic health record data from adult patients on mechanical ventilation who had been admitted to a medical or cardiac intensive care unit at an academic, tertiary-care center between January 1, 2015, and December 31, 2023. We utilized a mixed-effects, multivariate logistic regression model to evaluate the association between timely extubation within 6 hours of first passing an SBT and 15 potential reasons to delay extubation, accounting for clustering at the attending-physician level. <b>Results:</b> Among 3,240 patients, 62.3% underwent timely extubation within 6 hours of first passing an SBT. Patients with delayed extubation experienced a median of 2.0 (interquartile range = 1.0-3.8) additional days on mechanical ventilation after passing an SBT, for a total of 3,930 days. This delay accounts for 32% of the total time on mechanical ventilation for the study population. Patients were less likely to have timely extubation if they underwent a procedure in the 24 hours after passing an SBT (average marginal effect [AME], -17.7%; 95% confidence interval [CI] = -29.2 to -6.3); had lower levels of consciousness (AME, -16.5%; 95% CI = -23.2 to -10.0); were on low-dose vasopressors (AME, -12.9%; 95% CI = -19.2 to -4.8) or high-dose vasopressors (AME, -12.2%; 95% CI = -17.8 to -8.1); or had copious secretions (AME, -8.7%; 95% CI = -13.3 to -4.1). However, 55% of patients with delayed extubation experienced none of these top five potential barriers. There was minimal physician variability in the decision to extubate after a successful SBT (median odds ratio: 1.10; 95% CI = 1.02 to 1.78). The most frequent reason documented by respiratory therapists for not extubating a patient after passing an SBT was attending-physician preference (43%). <b>Conclusions:</b> One in 3 patients remain on mechanical ventilation after passing their first SBT, with over half lacking an identifiable barrier to extubation. Future work should be pursued to address this, including the consideration of unitwide interventions to increase timely extubation attempts among patients without contraindications.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Annals of the American Thoracic Society
Published
2025-05-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1513/annalsats.202502-188oc
Primary Topic
Family and Patient Care in Intensive Care Units
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Providers Consistently Delay Extubation after Successful Spontaneous Breathing Trials: A Retrospective Cohort Study

R.K. Hechtman, Michael W. Sjoding, Anna Barker, Megan Acho
1 links
Annals of the American Thoracic Society
Family and Patient Care in Intensive Care Units
article

Providers Consistently Delay Extubation after Successful Spontaneous Breathing Trials: A Retrospective Cohort Study

R.K. Hechtman, Michael W. Sjoding, Anna Barker, Megan Acho
article en

Abstract

<b>Rationale:</b> Many patients who pass a spontaneous breathing trial (SBT) are not extubated, leaving them at risk for life-threatening ventilator-associated complications. Determining barriers to timely extubation may facilitate shorter overall durations of mechanical ventilation. <b>Objectives:</b> We sought to identify the patient-related and patient-independent barriers to timely extubation within 6 hours of passing an SBT. <b>Methods:</b> We analyzed electronic health record data from adult patients on mechanical ventilation who had been admitted to a medical or cardiac intensive care unit at an academic, tertiary-care center between January 1, 2015, and December 31, 2023. We utilized a mixed-effects, multivariate logistic regression model to evaluate the association between timely extubation within 6 hours of first passing an SBT and 15 potential reasons to delay extubation, accounting for clustering at the attending-physician level. <b>Results:</b> Among 3,240 patients, 62.3% underwent timely extubation within 6 hours of first passing an SBT. Patients with delayed extubation experienced a median of 2.0 (interquartile range = 1.0-3.8) additional days on mechanical ventilation after passing an SBT, for a total of 3,930 days. This delay accounts for 32% of the total time on mechanical ventilation for the study population. Patients were less likely to have timely extubation if they underwent a procedure in the 24 hours after passing an SBT (average marginal effect [AME], -17.7%; 95% confidence interval [CI] = -29.2 to -6.3); had lower levels of consciousness (AME, -16.5%; 95% CI = -23.2 to -10.0); were on low-dose vasopressors (AME, -12.9%; 95% CI = -19.2 to -4.8) or high-dose vasopressors (AME, -12.2%; 95% CI = -17.8 to -8.1); or had copious secretions (AME, -8.7%; 95% CI = -13.3 to -4.1). However, 55% of patients with delayed extubation experienced none of these top five potential barriers. There was minimal physician variability in the decision to extubate after a successful SBT (median odds ratio: 1.10; 95% CI = 1.02 to 1.78). The most frequent reason documented by respiratory therapists for not extubating a patient after passing an SBT was attending-physician preference (43%). <b>Conclusions:</b> One in 3 patients remain on mechanical ventilation after passing their first SBT, with over half lacking an identifiable barrier to extubation. Future work should be pursued to address this, including the consideration of unitwide interventions to increase timely extubation attempts among patients without contraindications.

Annals of the American Thoracic SocietyVol. 22(10)
University of Michigan (US), Michigan United (US), Michigan Medicine (US)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 85%
Family and Patient Care in Intensive Care Units
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.