A Method for Detecting Knowledge Conflicts in Chinese Intelligent Agent Interactions

Aim/Purpose: This study aims to address the knowledge conflict issues encountered in multi-agent collaboration, particularly when agents based on large language models (LLMs) provide inconsistent answers or recommendations due to varied knowledge sources or errors caused by hallucinations. Background: The paper tackles the limitations of intelligent agents that cannot dynamically detect or resolve knowledge conflicts. The accuracy of agent responses is enhanced by introducing an automated conflict detection and resolution method. Methodology: We propose a Knowledge Conflict Resolution (KCR) method that leverages prompt engineering and fine-tuned LLM agents for conflict detection and resolution. The method is evaluated in task-oriented dialogue scenarios, comparing it against baseline models in terms of consistency, task success rate, and user satisfaction. Contribution: This study proposes a novel approach to detecting knowledge conflict in intelligent agents. Our innovative approach offers three key advantages over existing solutions: Higher Accuracy: Achieves 97.3% conflict detection rate compared to 85-91% in current methods. User-Friendly Design: Simplifies complex coordination between agents without technical expertise. Practical Implementation: Works effectively across different LLM platforms without requiring system overhauls. Findings: Experimental results show that our KCR method significantly outperforms existing approaches in resolving conflicts and maintaining coherent multi-agent conversations, notably improving user-perceived reliability. Recommendations for Practitioners: Incorporating conflict detection mechanisms in intelligent agents can improve knowledge management and enhance user satisfaction, particularly in knowledge-intensive industries. Recommendation for Researchers: Ensuring the consistency and accuracy of knowledge from different sources is crucial. This paper proposes an effective knowledge conflict detection method to enhance the consistency of knowledge. Impact on Society: Enhances the reliability and accuracy of intelligent agents in professional fields, facilitates organizational knowledge consistency, and promotes the practical adoption of large language models in complex scenarios. Future Research: Future research should broaden the scope of this method to include English, investigate its applicability in multimodal large models, and further develop strategies to ensure organizational knowledge consistency in intelligent agents.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Interdisciplinary Journal of Information Knowledge and Management
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.28945/5497
Primary Topic
Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Method for Detecting Knowledge Conflicts in Chinese Intelligent Agent Interactions

Huanyu Cheng, Mingxuan Xi, Qiuyuan Zhong, Wei Liu et al.
Interdisciplinary Journal of Information Knowledge and Management
Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation
article

A Method for Detecting Knowledge Conflicts in Chinese Intelligent Agent Interactions

Huanyu Cheng, Mingxuan Xi, Qiuyuan Zhong, Wei Liu, Y. T. Gu
article en

Abstract

Aim/Purpose: This study aims to address the knowledge conflict issues encountered in multi-agent collaboration, particularly when agents based on large language models (LLMs) provide inconsistent answers or recommendations due to varied knowledge sources or errors caused by hallucinations. Background: The paper tackles the limitations of intelligent agents that cannot dynamically detect or resolve knowledge conflicts. The accuracy of agent responses is enhanced by introducing an automated conflict detection and resolution method. Methodology: We propose a Knowledge Conflict Resolution (KCR) method that leverages prompt engineering and fine-tuned LLM agents for conflict detection and resolution. The method is evaluated in task-oriented dialogue scenarios, comparing it against baseline models in terms of consistency, task success rate, and user satisfaction. Contribution: This study proposes a novel approach to detecting knowledge conflict in intelligent agents. Our innovative approach offers three key advantages over existing solutions: Higher Accuracy: Achieves 97.3% conflict detection rate compared to 85-91% in current methods. User-Friendly Design: Simplifies complex coordination between agents without technical expertise. Practical Implementation: Works effectively across different LLM platforms without requiring system overhauls. Findings: Experimental results show that our KCR method significantly outperforms existing approaches in resolving conflicts and maintaining coherent multi-agent conversations, notably improving user-perceived reliability. Recommendations for Practitioners: Incorporating conflict detection mechanisms in intelligent agents can improve knowledge management and enhance user satisfaction, particularly in knowledge-intensive industries. Recommendation for Researchers: Ensuring the consistency and accuracy of knowledge from different sources is crucial. This paper proposes an effective knowledge conflict detection method to enhance the consistency of knowledge. Impact on Society: Enhances the reliability and accuracy of intelligent agents in professional fields, facilitates organizational knowledge consistency, and promotes the practical adoption of large language models in complex scenarios. Future Research: Future research should broaden the scope of this method to include English, investigate its applicability in multimodal large models, and further develop strategies to ensure organizational knowledge consistency in intelligent agents.

Interdisciplinary Journal of Information Knowledge and ManagementVol. 20
Openalex Percentile: Top 95%
Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.