Python-driven sensitivity analysis of geometric parameters: Evaluating the impact of geometric variations on environmental performance of large office in Boston

This research conducted a quantitative analysis of the impacts of design decisions made in the early stages of the design process, specifically focusing on their environmental effects. Through Sensitivity analysis, this study explores the relationship between design parameters of spatial structures and environmental consequences for each geometric form within a large office space in Boston, employing a multidisciplinary approach that integrates Python with parametric modeling software. Specifically, it aims to determine which variables—such as length, width, and height for a cube, and height, radius, and length for a cylinder—most significantly influence the environmental outcomes. The research primarily employs Rhino and Grasshopper for parametric modeling of a cube and a cylinder, followed by climate analysis using Honeybee and Ladybug tools. Subsequently, the Environmental Impact of energy consumption during the operational phase (B6 stage) is assessed through OpenLCA. The findings indicate that the cylinder configuration offers significantly better energy efficiency and 5.3% lower environmental impact compared to the cube. Sensitivity analysis through Scatter plot, FRE, XGBoost, RF, and SHAP values diagrams highlight that among the cube’s parameters (length, width, height), length is a critical factor for its sustainable design, while for the cylinder varieties (height, radius), height holds greater significance. Among the various environmental impacts assessed, fossil fuel depletion emerged as the most crucial category. The investigation conclusively underlines the imperative of optimizing geometric parameters to significantly influence reduce the ecological footprint, thereby advocating for strategic, evidence-based design decisions in the sustainable architecture field. • Integration of machine learning with parametric design advances climate change solutions. • Cube design’s sustainability is heavily influenced by length. • Height significantly affects the cylinder’s environmental efficiency. • Cylinder forms reduce environmental impact by 5.3% versus cubes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Green Technologies and Sustainability
Published
2025-05-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.grets.2025.100222
Primary Topic
Building Energy and Comfort Optimization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Python-driven sensitivity analysis of geometric parameters: Evaluating the impact of geometric variations on environmental performance of large office in Boston

Zinat Javanmard, Consuelo Nava
Green Technologies and Sustainability
Building Energy and Comfort Optimization
article

Python-driven sensitivity analysis of geometric parameters: Evaluating the impact of geometric variations on environmental performance of large office in Boston

Zinat Javanmard, Consuelo Nava
article en

Abstract

This research conducted a quantitative analysis of the impacts of design decisions made in the early stages of the design process, specifically focusing on their environmental effects. Through Sensitivity analysis, this study explores the relationship between design parameters of spatial structures and environmental consequences for each geometric form within a large office space in Boston, employing a multidisciplinary approach that integrates Python with parametric modeling software. Specifically, it aims to determine which variables—such as length, width, and height for a cube, and height, radius, and length for a cylinder—most significantly influence the environmental outcomes. The research primarily employs Rhino and Grasshopper for parametric modeling of a cube and a cylinder, followed by climate analysis using Honeybee and Ladybug tools. Subsequently, the Environmental Impact of energy consumption during the operational phase (B6 stage) is assessed through OpenLCA. The findings indicate that the cylinder configuration offers significantly better energy efficiency and 5.3% lower environmental impact compared to the cube. Sensitivity analysis through Scatter plot, FRE, XGBoost, RF, and SHAP values diagrams highlight that among the cube’s parameters (length, width, height), length is a critical factor for its sustainable design, while for the cylinder varieties (height, radius), height holds greater significance. Among the various environmental impacts assessed, fossil fuel depletion emerged as the most crucial category. The investigation conclusively underlines the imperative of optimizing geometric parameters to significantly influence reduce the ecological footprint, thereby advocating for strategic, evidence-based design decisions in the sustainable architecture field. • Integration of machine learning with parametric design advances climate change solutions. • Cube design’s sustainability is heavily influenced by length. • Height significantly affects the cylinder’s environmental efficiency. • Cylinder forms reduce environmental impact by 5.3% versus cubes.

Green Technologies and SustainabilityVol. 3(4)
University of Reggio Calabria (IT)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 89%
Building Energy and Comfort Optimization
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.