Unsupervised optimization of spectral pre-processing selection to achieve transfer of Raman calibration models

• Pre-processing optimization is proposed as an unsupervised model transfer method. • Maximum Mean Discrepancy (MMD) used as metric for pre-processing selection. • MMD quantifies the distance between predictions in source and target domains. • Method demonstrated on simulations, industrial use cases and benchmarked. • Consistent target domain generalization achieved for covariate shift scenarios. Spectral pre-processing is a crucial step in the development of calibration models for spectroscopic process analytical technology (PAT). Typically, pre-processing is optimized in the source domain, which can hinder deployment to new (target) domains as spectral differences may arise when sample or instrument changes occur. While specialized methods for calibration transfer and maintenance exist, this work suggests using pre-processing alone as a straightforward method to achieve model transfer. Maximum mean discrepancy (MMD) is used as an unsupervised metric for selecting a model (pre-processing) with optimized performance in the target domain. MMD utilizes unlabeled target spectra to quantify the distance between the distributions of the source and target predictions of qualified candidate models (models with acceptable source domain performance) and the model with minimal discrepancy between the predictions is selected. Applicability of the MMD-based pre-processing selection was initially explored on simulations of different types of dataset shifts (covariate, conditional and prior), which suggested that the method achieved successful transfer primarily under covariate shift. Next, the approach was applied to two use cases from the biopharmaceutical industry (varying process and acquisition settings; varying instruments from different manufacturers), where the MMD method achieved lower error of prediction in the target domain compared to a cross-validation based pre-processing selection. Finally, the proposed approach was benchmarked with domain-invariant partial least squares showing superior performance of pre-processing while highlighting benefits of combining both approaches. Overall, this work presents a novel and easy-to-adopt unsupervised model transfer method applicable to many common transfer scenarios encountered in bioprocessing.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Measurement
Published
2025-05-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2025.117906
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Spectroscopy and Chemometric Analyses
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.50

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Unsupervised optimization of spectral pre-processing selection to achieve transfer of Raman calibration models

Andreas Schwaighofer, Mark J. Henson, Oliver Spadiut, Ramin Nikzad‐Langerodi et al.
2 citations
Measurement
Spectroscopy and Chemometric Analyses
1.50
article

Unsupervised optimization of spectral pre-processing selection to achieve transfer of Raman calibration models

Andreas Schwaighofer, Mark J. Henson, Oliver Spadiut, Ramin Nikzad‐Langerodi, Alexandra Umprecht, Valeria Fonseca Díaz, Bence Kozma, Bianca Mikulasek
article en
2 citations

Abstract

• Pre-processing optimization is proposed as an unsupervised model transfer method. • Maximum Mean Discrepancy (MMD) used as metric for pre-processing selection. • MMD quantifies the distance between predictions in source and target domains. • Method demonstrated on simulations, industrial use cases and benchmarked. • Consistent target domain generalization achieved for covariate shift scenarios. Spectral pre-processing is a crucial step in the development of calibration models for spectroscopic process analytical technology (PAT). Typically, pre-processing is optimized in the source domain, which can hinder deployment to new (target) domains as spectral differences may arise when sample or instrument changes occur. While specialized methods for calibration transfer and maintenance exist, this work suggests using pre-processing alone as a straightforward method to achieve model transfer. Maximum mean discrepancy (MMD) is used as an unsupervised metric for selecting a model (pre-processing) with optimized performance in the target domain. MMD utilizes unlabeled target spectra to quantify the distance between the distributions of the source and target predictions of qualified candidate models (models with acceptable source domain performance) and the model with minimal discrepancy between the predictions is selected. Applicability of the MMD-based pre-processing selection was initially explored on simulations of different types of dataset shifts (covariate, conditional and prior), which suggested that the method achieved successful transfer primarily under covariate shift. Next, the approach was applied to two use cases from the biopharmaceutical industry (varying process and acquisition settings; varying instruments from different manufacturers), where the MMD method achieved lower error of prediction in the target domain compared to a cross-validation based pre-processing selection. Finally, the proposed approach was benchmarked with domain-invariant partial least squares showing superior performance of pre-processing while highlighting benefits of combining both approaches. Overall, this work presents a novel and easy-to-adopt unsupervised model transfer method applicable to many common transfer scenarios encountered in bioprocessing.

MeasurementVol. 255
TU Wien (AT), Baxter (Austria) (AT), Software Competence Center Hagenberg (Austria) (AT), Takeda (Austria) (AT), Takeda (Japan) (JP)
Bundesministerium für Klimaschutz, Umwelt, Energie, Mobilität, Innovation und Technologie, Österreichische Forschungsförderungsgesellschaft, Bundesministerium für Digitalisierung und Wirtschaftsstandort
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Spectroscopy and Chemometric Analyses
1.50
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.