A group-based, online-delivered pain management programme (iSelf-help) is not inferior to a group-based, in-person programme in reducing pain-related disability for people with persistent pain: A non-inferiority randomised, two-arm, parallel, open-la

A group-based, online-delivered version (iSelf-help) of an existing group-based in-person pain management programme was developed. Development included Māori (New Zealand's Indigenous population) cultural considerations of content. This study determined whether offering iSelf-help was non-inferior to the in-person pain management programme in reducing pain-related disability at six months. The study used a non-inferiority randomised, two-arm, parallel, open-label trial with blinding of assessors, including health economic and process evaluations. Participants were adults (age≥18 years) with persistent non-cancer pain referred to a hospital-based regional pain service who were deemed eligible for a pain management programme. iSelf-help groups participated in two 60-minute video-conferencing sessions (first, peer support facilitated; second, clinician facilitated) weekly for 12 weeks with access to resources via smartphone app and website. In-person groups received 12-week in-person pain management programme. The primary outcome was the Modified Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire. Secondary outcomes included anxiety, depression, stress, pain severity and interference, health related quality of life, self-efficacy, acceptance, and satisfaction. Recruited were 113 participants (56 iSelf-help, 57 in-person), mean(SD) age 38.2(13.7) years, 75% female, 16% Māori. Using modified intention-to-treat analysis on the primary outcome at six months (n=73), iSelf-help was non-inferior to in-person pain management programme with a point estimate (95% one-sided CI) of -0.4 (∞, 1.5). It was also non-inferior for secondary outcomes of anxiety, depression, stress, activity interference, health related quality of life, and self-efficacy. iSelf-help was cheaper, had similar overall satisfaction, but higher accessibility, scores. iSelf-help showed non-inferior clinical outcomes for improving pain-related disability in people with persistent non-cancer pain. PERSPECTIVE: This article evaluates a novel online-delivered pain management programme (iSelf-help) co-created with people with persistent pain, with committed and ongoing collaboration with Māori whānau (Indigenous population of New Zealand). iSelf-help may improve access to the regional pain service used in this study for more people living with persistent pain.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Pain
Published
2025-05-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpain.2025.105447
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.39
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A group-based, online-delivered pain management programme (iSelf-help) is not inferior to a group-based, in-person programme in reducing pain-related disability for people with persistent pain: A non-inferiority randomised, two-arm, parallel, open-la

Andrew Gray, Bernadette Jones, Dagmar Hempel, Meredith Perry et al.
1 citations
Journal of Pain
Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
1.39
article

A group-based, online-delivered pain management programme (iSelf-help) is not inferior to a group-based, in-person programme in reducing pain-related disability for people with persistent pain: A non-inferiority randomised, two-arm, parallel, open-la

Andrew Gray, Bernadette Jones, Dagmar Hempel, Meredith Perry, Sarah Gerard Dean, Antony Dowell, Tristram Ingham, Rebecca Grainger, Hemakumar Devan, Leigh Hale, Suranga Dassanayake, Barbara Saipe, Cheryl Davies, William Leung
article en
1 citations

Abstract

A group-based, online-delivered version (iSelf-help) of an existing group-based in-person pain management programme was developed. Development included Māori (New Zealand's Indigenous population) cultural considerations of content. This study determined whether offering iSelf-help was non-inferior to the in-person pain management programme in reducing pain-related disability at six months. The study used a non-inferiority randomised, two-arm, parallel, open-label trial with blinding of assessors, including health economic and process evaluations. Participants were adults (age≥18 years) with persistent non-cancer pain referred to a hospital-based regional pain service who were deemed eligible for a pain management programme. iSelf-help groups participated in two 60-minute video-conferencing sessions (first, peer support facilitated; second, clinician facilitated) weekly for 12 weeks with access to resources via smartphone app and website. In-person groups received 12-week in-person pain management programme. The primary outcome was the Modified Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire. Secondary outcomes included anxiety, depression, stress, pain severity and interference, health related quality of life, self-efficacy, acceptance, and satisfaction. Recruited were 113 participants (56 iSelf-help, 57 in-person), mean(SD) age 38.2(13.7) years, 75% female, 16% Māori. Using modified intention-to-treat analysis on the primary outcome at six months (n=73), iSelf-help was non-inferior to in-person pain management programme with a point estimate (95% one-sided CI) of -0.4 (∞, 1.5). It was also non-inferior for secondary outcomes of anxiety, depression, stress, activity interference, health related quality of life, and self-efficacy. iSelf-help was cheaper, had similar overall satisfaction, but higher accessibility, scores. iSelf-help showed non-inferior clinical outcomes for improving pain-related disability in people with persistent non-cancer pain. PERSPECTIVE: This article evaluates a novel online-delivered pain management programme (iSelf-help) co-created with people with persistent pain, with committed and ongoing collaboration with Māori whānau (Indigenous population of New Zealand). iSelf-help may improve access to the regional pain service used in this study for more people living with persistent pain.

Journal of PainVol. 32
University of Exeter (GB), Sabah Environmental Trust (MY), Capital and Coast District Health Board (NZ), University of Otago (NZ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
1.39
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.