When green turns red: Is the perception of greenwashing a barrier to individual green investment?

• Perceived greenwashing is a barrier to individual investors’ green investments. • Greenwashing deters current green investments and future investment intentions. • Negativity bias: high greenwashing reduces investment; low has no positive effect. • Negative emotions and risk mediate how greenwashing impacts green investing. Based on a survey of 2,215 French investors, this study examines the impact of greenwashing perception on individual investment decisions. Our findings reveal that greenwashing perception is negatively related to green investing. Specifically, A one-point increase in greenwashing reduces investment likelihood by 1.68 percentage points. This perception discourages traditional investors from considering green funds and dissuades existing green investors from increasing their green investments. Moreover, consistent with negativity bias, low perceptions of greenwashing have no positive effect on green investments, while high perceptions negatively affect them by triggering negative emotions that heighten risk perception and deter green investment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Finance research letters
Published
2025-05-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2025.107605
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Environmental Sustainability in Business
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.22
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

When green turns red: Is the perception of greenwashing a barrier to individual green investment?

Fabrice Hervé, Sylvain Marsat, Syrine Gacem
3 citations
Finance research letters
Environmental Sustainability in Business
6.22
article

When green turns red: Is the perception of greenwashing a barrier to individual green investment?

Fabrice Hervé, Sylvain Marsat, Syrine Gacem
article en
3 citations

Abstract

• Perceived greenwashing is a barrier to individual investors’ green investments. • Greenwashing deters current green investments and future investment intentions. • Negativity bias: high greenwashing reduces investment; low has no positive effect. • Negative emotions and risk mediate how greenwashing impacts green investing. Based on a survey of 2,215 French investors, this study examines the impact of greenwashing perception on individual investment decisions. Our findings reveal that greenwashing perception is negatively related to green investing. Specifically, A one-point increase in greenwashing reduces investment likelihood by 1.68 percentage points. This perception discourages traditional investors from considering green funds and dissuades existing green investors from increasing their green investments. Moreover, consistent with negativity bias, low perceptions of greenwashing have no positive effect on green investments, while high perceptions negatively affect them by triggering negative emotions that heighten risk perception and deter green investment.

Finance research lettersVol. 82
Université de Bourgogne (FR), University of Clermont Auvergne (FR), Sigma Clermont (FR), Clermont Université (FR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Environmental Sustainability in Business
6.22
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.