Two is better than one? A case study of co-teaching in a transnational university in China

This article investigates co-teaching in a foundation year of a Sino-Foreign Cooperative University in China with the purpose to explore how co-teaching can manifest and benefit learners in such a setting. The research, taking the form of an exploratory case study, spans four academic years and is based on data from seminars and lecture recordings along with responses from teachers and students. The authors’ experiences also contributed to the findings in the form of an autoethnographic account. Co-teaching is shown to take several forms, from complex team teaching to a second teacher assisting. Generally, students felt more engaged, and their instructors observed that language learning in the classroom was facilitated. Findings showed that the interaction between two teachers and its effects in co-teaching can be explained by Bandura’s social learning theory, in that teachers could model social skills by doing rather than prescribing. Teacher interaction also offered the basis for staging dialogues displaying different perspectives informing students’ development. Relevant to the multicultural environment of the context, co-teaching offered students opportunities to observe the enactment of skills such as thinking critically and intercultural interaction. This study suggests that co-teaching is a promising approach for transnational settings and more research is needed to understand the challenges to its implementation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Research in Comparative and International Education
Published
2025-05-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/17454999251343808
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Collaborative Teaching and Inclusion
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.93
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Two is better than one? A case study of co-teaching in a transnational university in China

Robert J. Smith, Shih-Ching Picucci-Huang, Mattia Miani
1 citations
Research in Comparative and International Education
Collaborative Teaching and Inclusion
8.93
article

Two is better than one? A case study of co-teaching in a transnational university in China

Robert J. Smith, Shih-Ching Picucci-Huang, Mattia Miani
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This article investigates co-teaching in a foundation year of a Sino-Foreign Cooperative University in China with the purpose to explore how co-teaching can manifest and benefit learners in such a setting. The research, taking the form of an exploratory case study, spans four academic years and is based on data from seminars and lecture recordings along with responses from teachers and students. The authors’ experiences also contributed to the findings in the form of an autoethnographic account. Co-teaching is shown to take several forms, from complex team teaching to a second teacher assisting. Generally, students felt more engaged, and their instructors observed that language learning in the classroom was facilitated. Findings showed that the interaction between two teachers and its effects in co-teaching can be explained by Bandura’s social learning theory, in that teachers could model social skills by doing rather than prescribing. Teacher interaction also offered the basis for staging dialogues displaying different perspectives informing students’ development. Relevant to the multicultural environment of the context, co-teaching offered students opportunities to observe the enactment of skills such as thinking critically and intercultural interaction. This study suggests that co-teaching is a promising approach for transnational settings and more research is needed to understand the challenges to its implementation.

Research in Comparative and International EducationVol. 20(3)
University of Nottingham Ningbo China (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Collaborative Teaching and Inclusion
8.93
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.