Impact of esophageal myotomy length during laparoscopic Heller myotomy for achalasia type II

Background: Type II achalasia (Ach2) is the most prevalent esophageal motility disorder. Current guidelines recommend laparoscopic Heller myotomy (LHM) as a standard treatment, but the optimal esophageal myotomy length remains under investigation. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted from 2018 to 2023 at a tertiary care center. Consecutive Ach2 patients undergoing LHM were included. Patients were grouped based on myotomy length (short vs long). Outcomes assessed included operative time, adverse events, Eckardt scores at 6 and 12 months, and treatment success. Results: Fifty-one patients were analyzed. Eckardt score at 6 months was significantly lower in the long myotomy group compared to the short group (1.2±1.1 vs 0.6±1.2, p=0.023). At 12 months, Eckardt scores were also significantly better in the long myotomy group (1.8±1.7 vs 0.9±1.2, p=0.033). Treatment success at 12 months was 92% in the short group and 100% in the long group, but it was not statistically significant (p=0.191). Conclusions: LHM provides high clinical success in Ach2 patients. While treatment success at 12 months was similar between groups, longer myotomy was associated with significantly lower Eckardt scores at both 6 and 12 months. These findings suggest a potential benefit in symptom control with longer myotomy, supporting further prospective studies to determine its clinical utility.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Surgery Journal
Published
2025-05-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-2902.isj20251452
Primary Topic
Gastroesophageal reflux and treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impact of esophageal myotomy length during laparoscopic Heller myotomy for achalasia type II

Samuel Rodrigo Gómez-Arenas, Yamir Ahmed Nacud-Bezies, Cristopher Rosales-Vazquez, Giova Camacho-Cervantes et al.
International Surgery Journal
Gastroesophageal reflux and treatments
article

Impact of esophageal myotomy length during laparoscopic Heller myotomy for achalasia type II

Samuel Rodrigo Gómez-Arenas, Yamir Ahmed Nacud-Bezies, Cristopher Rosales-Vazquez, Giova Camacho-Cervantes, Carlos I. Verdugo-Salazar
article en

Abstract

Background: Type II achalasia (Ach2) is the most prevalent esophageal motility disorder. Current guidelines recommend laparoscopic Heller myotomy (LHM) as a standard treatment, but the optimal esophageal myotomy length remains under investigation. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted from 2018 to 2023 at a tertiary care center. Consecutive Ach2 patients undergoing LHM were included. Patients were grouped based on myotomy length (short vs long). Outcomes assessed included operative time, adverse events, Eckardt scores at 6 and 12 months, and treatment success. Results: Fifty-one patients were analyzed. Eckardt score at 6 months was significantly lower in the long myotomy group compared to the short group (1.2±1.1 vs 0.6±1.2, p=0.023). At 12 months, Eckardt scores were also significantly better in the long myotomy group (1.8±1.7 vs 0.9±1.2, p=0.033). Treatment success at 12 months was 92% in the short group and 100% in the long group, but it was not statistically significant (p=0.191). Conclusions: LHM provides high clinical success in Ach2 patients. While treatment success at 12 months was similar between groups, longer myotomy was associated with significantly lower Eckardt scores at both 6 and 12 months. These findings suggest a potential benefit in symptom control with longer myotomy, supporting further prospective studies to determine its clinical utility.

International Surgery Journal
Hospital de Especialidades (MX), University of Monterrey (MX)
Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
Gastroesophageal reflux and treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.