Green transition initiatives to reduce environmental degradation: Adaptation, mitigation and synergistic effects

Green transitions are crucial strategies for mitigating environmental degradation and are aligned with the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) of the United Nations such as SDG 7, SDG 11 and SDG 13. This study used an expanded STIRPAT framework to investigate the adaptation, mitigation, and synergistic effects of green transition variables, namely, Renewable Energy Transition (RES), Green Finance (GFC) and Green Technology (GT). Ecological Footprint (EF) and Load Capacity Factor (LF) indicators were integrated to overcome the limitations of CO₂-centric indicators towards environmental degradation. Empirical analysis employs structured methods, including heteroskedasticity-robust panel unit root tests, long-run estimation (FMOLS), asymmetric effects (MMQR), and robustness checks (panel EGLS and D-H causality tests). The FMOLS results indicate that RES, GFC and GT create a synergistic governance framework that amplifies their individual impacts. GFC supports the R&D and deployment of GT, while GT optimizes the performance of RES projects. RES accelerates the adoption of renewables, enhancing energy efficiency and further reducing environmental degradation. MMQR results show that RES consistently reduces EF and increases LF across all quantiles, highlighting its key role in mitigating degradation. GFC exhibits varied effects across quantiles, while GT has significant positive effects on LF in lower to middle quantiles and reduces EF in higher quantiles. However, its impact on both LF and EF is less pronounced compared to that of RES and GFC. The insights gained here from the G-6 countries serve as a valuable guide or emerging economies, such as those of the BRICS, in developing adaptation and mitigation strategies to navigate the trade-offs between socio-economic developments and ecological thresholds. • Synergistic effects of RES, GFC and GT in reducing environmental degradation for G6 economies. • By integrating EF and LF as indicators an integrated view of environmental degradation can be captured. • Robust econometric methods help reveal quantile-specific impacts and synergistic effects. • Lessons from developed economies help guide the transition pathways for emerging economies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environmental Impact Assessment Review
Published
2025-05-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2025.107993
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
18.79

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Green transition initiatives to reduce environmental degradation: Adaptation, mitigation and synergistic effects

Binlin Li, Mohammad Mafizur Rahman, Nils Hendrik Haneklaus, Shuqin Li et al.
6 citations
Environmental Impact Assessment Review
Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
18.79
article

Green transition initiatives to reduce environmental degradation: Adaptation, mitigation and synergistic effects

Binlin Li, Mohammad Mafizur Rahman, Nils Hendrik Haneklaus, Shuqin Li, Yufei Zhou
article en
6 citations

Abstract

Green transitions are crucial strategies for mitigating environmental degradation and are aligned with the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) of the United Nations such as SDG 7, SDG 11 and SDG 13. This study used an expanded STIRPAT framework to investigate the adaptation, mitigation, and synergistic effects of green transition variables, namely, Renewable Energy Transition (RES), Green Finance (GFC) and Green Technology (GT). Ecological Footprint (EF) and Load Capacity Factor (LF) indicators were integrated to overcome the limitations of CO₂-centric indicators towards environmental degradation. Empirical analysis employs structured methods, including heteroskedasticity-robust panel unit root tests, long-run estimation (FMOLS), asymmetric effects (MMQR), and robustness checks (panel EGLS and D-H causality tests). The FMOLS results indicate that RES, GFC and GT create a synergistic governance framework that amplifies their individual impacts. GFC supports the R&D and deployment of GT, while GT optimizes the performance of RES projects. RES accelerates the adoption of renewables, enhancing energy efficiency and further reducing environmental degradation. MMQR results show that RES consistently reduces EF and increases LF across all quantiles, highlighting its key role in mitigating degradation. GFC exhibits varied effects across quantiles, while GT has significant positive effects on LF in lower to middle quantiles and reduces EF in higher quantiles. However, its impact on both LF and EF is less pronounced compared to that of RES and GFC. The insights gained here from the G-6 countries serve as a valuable guide or emerging economies, such as those of the BRICS, in developing adaptation and mitigation strategies to navigate the trade-offs between socio-economic developments and ecological thresholds. • Synergistic effects of RES, GFC and GT in reducing environmental degradation for G6 economies. • By integrating EF and LF as indicators an integrated view of environmental degradation can be captured. • Robust econometric methods help reveal quantile-specific impacts and synergistic effects. • Lessons from developed economies help guide the transition pathways for emerging economies.

Environmental Impact Assessment ReviewVol. 115
Universität für Weiterbildung Krems (AT), University of Southern Queensland (AU), Yunnan Agricultural University (CN), North-West University (ZA), Ocean University of China (CN)
Ministry of Education of the People's Republic of China, Austrian Science Fund, Bundesministerium für Bildung, Wissenschaft und Forschung, Humanities and Social Science Fund of Ministry of Education of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
18.79
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.