INTRODUCTION TO THE DIGITAL GENESIS OF EMERGING ADMINISTRATIVE PARADIGMS

The purpose of this study is to investigate the main currents of the new administrative paradigms in the digital environment and their influence on the understanding and internalization of renewed management strategies in today's organizations. The specialized bibliographic research is articulated around three central axes: (a) Idea of paradigm according to the stages of knowledge (b) Idea of paradigm according to the development of administrative thought (c) Paradigmatic currents of administrative practices originated and generated in the digital era. The methodological design is aligned with the attributes of a Documented Reflection, being a referential work that uses bibliographic review, hermeneutics and the experience of the researcher as techniques. The results highlight that the nascent administrative paradigms are distinguished by their greater adaptability, horizontality and centrality in people. It was determined that the primary difference between classical administrative paradigms and those founded in the digital age lies in their notion of structure. That is, while conventional organizations tend to have hierarchical and centralized structures with defined levels of authority and responsibility, digital organizations adopt flatter and decentralized structures, driving agile decision-making and organizational flexibility.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Posthumanism
Published
2025-05-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.63332/joph.v5i5.1848
Primary Topic
Legal and Policy Issues
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

INTRODUCTION TO THE DIGITAL GENESIS OF EMERGING ADMINISTRATIVE PARADIGMS

Galvarino Casanueva-Yáñez, Pedro Arcia-Hernández, Jorge Torres-Vásquez, Reina Marlene Pérez-Vargas et al.
Journal of Posthumanism
Legal and Policy Issues
article

INTRODUCTION TO THE DIGITAL GENESIS OF EMERGING ADMINISTRATIVE PARADIGMS

Galvarino Casanueva-Yáñez, Pedro Arcia-Hernández, Jorge Torres-Vásquez, Reina Marlene Pérez-Vargas, Orlando Gallegos-Gonzales, Antony Paul Espíritu-Martínez, Mauricio Agustín García-Manríquez, Hugo Eusebio Romero-Delgado, Pedro Arturo Barboza-Zelada
article en

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to investigate the main currents of the new administrative paradigms in the digital environment and their influence on the understanding and internalization of renewed management strategies in today's organizations. The specialized bibliographic research is articulated around three central axes: (a) Idea of paradigm according to the stages of knowledge (b) Idea of paradigm according to the development of administrative thought (c) Paradigmatic currents of administrative practices originated and generated in the digital era. The methodological design is aligned with the attributes of a Documented Reflection, being a referential work that uses bibliographic review, hermeneutics and the experience of the researcher as techniques. The results highlight that the nascent administrative paradigms are distinguished by their greater adaptability, horizontality and centrality in people. It was determined that the primary difference between classical administrative paradigms and those founded in the digital age lies in their notion of structure. That is, while conventional organizations tend to have hierarchical and centralized structures with defined levels of authority and responsibility, digital organizations adopt flatter and decentralized structures, driving agile decision-making and organizational flexibility.

Journal of PosthumanismVol. 5(5)
Universidad Autónoma de Guadalajara (MX), Universidad de Guadalajara (MX), National Autonomous University of Nicaragua (NI), Universidad Privada San Juan Bautista (PE), Universidad César Vallejo (PE), Universidad de las Américas (NI), University of the Americas (CL), Universidad de Huánuco (PE), Universidad Tecnológica del Perú (PE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 82%
Legal and Policy Issues
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.