The role of oath in proving civil claims in Afghan law

An oath is one of the proofs of a lawsuit, and it consists of taking God's witness for news that is right for one's own benefit and to the detriment of another. Leaving the fate of the dispute to the oath as a spiritual tool is done in cases where no other valid reason can be presented to prove the subject of the dispute. In such a case, either the plaintiff's claim should be accepted without reason or a judgment should be issued against her, which neither of these two solutions is based on justice and there is a possibility of losing the right. In view of this problem, the legislator, by foreseeing a legal institution called oath, has left the fate of the lawsuit to the conscience to reveal the truth by relying on God and fearing the punishment of perjury. Considering the importance of the subject, this article has examined the role of oath in proving civil claims in Afghan law, and also evaluated the possibility and impossibility of realizing the conflict between the decisive oath and other proofs of the claim and concluded that the possibility of realizing There is no conflict between oath and other evidence.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific-Research Quarterly Journal of Law Knowledge
Published
2024-12-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.62134/srqjl/v2.i5.202412.4
Primary Topic
Politics and Conflicts in Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Middle East
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The role of oath in proving civil claims in Afghan law

Abdul Khaleq Shafaq
Scientific-Research Quarterly Journal of Law Knowledge
Politics and Conflicts in Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Middle East
article

The role of oath in proving civil claims in Afghan law

Abdul Khaleq Shafaq
article en

Abstract

An oath is one of the proofs of a lawsuit, and it consists of taking God's witness for news that is right for one's own benefit and to the detriment of another. Leaving the fate of the dispute to the oath as a spiritual tool is done in cases where no other valid reason can be presented to prove the subject of the dispute. In such a case, either the plaintiff's claim should be accepted without reason or a judgment should be issued against her, which neither of these two solutions is based on justice and there is a possibility of losing the right. In view of this problem, the legislator, by foreseeing a legal institution called oath, has left the fate of the lawsuit to the conscience to reveal the truth by relying on God and fearing the punishment of perjury. Considering the importance of the subject, this article has examined the role of oath in proving civil claims in Afghan law, and also evaluated the possibility and impossibility of realizing the conflict between the decisive oath and other proofs of the claim and concluded that the possibility of realizing There is no conflict between oath and other evidence.

Scientific-Research Quarterly Journal of Law KnowledgeVol. 2(5)
Hôpital Avicenne (FR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 52%
Politics and Conflicts in Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Middle East
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The role of oath in proving civil claims in Afghan law — Abdul Khaleq Shafaq · Scientific-Research Quarterly Journal of Law Knowledge (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS