Dynamic load on the head during rear impact against a headrest

A model of the dynamics of a vehicle collision with an energy-absorbing barrier was built in the PC-Crash 10.0 environment, using the following models: vehicle motion dynamics, collision, and multibody models of people seated on seats.The energy-absorbing barrier was composed of connected elements whose motion was described by Newton's and Euler's equations.Rear-seat passengers were modeled as polyhedral systems, each consisting of 20 rigid solids connected by spherical joints.The simulations investigated the effects of different headrest and seatback settings configurations on the dynamic loads acting on the head of a passenger seated in the rear bench seat.The results showed that the value of the coefficient describing the risk of head injury decreased as the backrest tilt angle increased, indicating that the head is better protected with greater tilt.The stiffness of the headrest significantly affected the value of the coefficient describing the risk of head injury, i.e., with a higher stiffness of 20,000 N/m, a strong negative correlation was observed, indicating a lower risk of injury.However, further increases in stiffness may negatively impact the risk of head injuries.In contrast, at lower stiffnesses, the correlation was more variable, with different results depending on the angle of the backrest.The results underscore that proper configuration of the backrest, seat tilt angles, and headrest stiffness are key to minimizing head injuries.Particularly favorable values of the coefficient describing the risk of head injury were achieved at angles of 5 headrest tilt angle and 10 headrest tilt angle and corresponding values of headrest stiffness.In general, a negative correlation was observed between the backrest tilt angle and the HIC 36ms value, i.e., the larger the tilt angle, the lower the HIC 36ms value, which means better protection.At the lower stiffness of the headrest, 15,000 N/m, the correlation was variable, both positive and negative, depending on the backrest tilt angle.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Advances in Science and Technology – Research Journal
Published
2025-05-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.12913/22998624/203858
Primary Topic
Automotive and Human Injury Biomechanics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Dynamic load on the head during rear impact against a headrest

Leszek Chybowski, Ewelina Kostecka, Przemysław Simiński, Tomasz Pusty et al.
Advances in Science and Technology – Research Journal
Automotive and Human Injury Biomechanics
article

Dynamic load on the head during rear impact against a headrest

Leszek Chybowski, Ewelina Kostecka, Przemysław Simiński, Tomasz Pusty, Jerzy Jackowski
article en

Abstract

A model of the dynamics of a vehicle collision with an energy-absorbing barrier was built in the PC-Crash 10.0 environment, using the following models: vehicle motion dynamics, collision, and multibody models of people seated on seats.The energy-absorbing barrier was composed of connected elements whose motion was described by Newton's and Euler's equations.Rear-seat passengers were modeled as polyhedral systems, each consisting of 20 rigid solids connected by spherical joints.The simulations investigated the effects of different headrest and seatback settings configurations on the dynamic loads acting on the head of a passenger seated in the rear bench seat.The results showed that the value of the coefficient describing the risk of head injury decreased as the backrest tilt angle increased, indicating that the head is better protected with greater tilt.The stiffness of the headrest significantly affected the value of the coefficient describing the risk of head injury, i.e., with a higher stiffness of 20,000 N/m, a strong negative correlation was observed, indicating a lower risk of injury.However, further increases in stiffness may negatively impact the risk of head injuries.In contrast, at lower stiffnesses, the correlation was more variable, with different results depending on the angle of the backrest.The results underscore that proper configuration of the backrest, seat tilt angles, and headrest stiffness are key to minimizing head injuries.Particularly favorable values of the coefficient describing the risk of head injury were achieved at angles of 5 headrest tilt angle and 10 headrest tilt angle and corresponding values of headrest stiffness.In general, a negative correlation was observed between the backrest tilt angle and the HIC 36ms value, i.e., the larger the tilt angle, the lower the HIC 36ms value, which means better protection.At the lower stiffness of the headrest, 15,000 N/m, the correlation was variable, both positive and negative, depending on the backrest tilt angle.

Advances in Science and Technology – Research JournalVol. 19(7)
Openalex Percentile: Top 82%
Automotive and Human Injury Biomechanics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.