Exploring the intention–behavior gap in food delivery applications: a digital transformation perspective in smart tourism
Purpose Integrating modern food technologies within the tourism sector improves the pleasures, convenience and involvement of travelers. Central to this advancement is AI-powered food applications (AI-PFDA), which are vital in driving this shift. However, the adoption of AI-PFDA is impeded by the gap between travelers’ usage intention (UI) and their actual usage behavior (UB), a phenomenon that has received limited scholarly attention in recent years. Design/methodology/approach To address the identified disparity, this study introduces a theoretical model based on self-determination theory, cognitive dissonance theory and mere exposure theory. The proposed model was tested using data collected from a questionnaire administered to 305 tourists in China, employing partial least squares structural equation modeling and necessary conditions analysis techniques. Findings Our findings demonstrate a significant partial mediating effect of perceived autonomy, competence and relatedness, a positive moderating effect of mere exposure and a negative moderating effect of reference price on the relationship between UI and UB. Originality/value This research enriches the current literature and assists policymakers in developing measures to mitigate the intention–behavior gap in adopting AI-PFDA within the framework of smart tourism.
Authors
- Jingbo Yuan (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0000-3876-5875)
- Sayed Kifayat Shah (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2637-5911)
- Thilini Chathurika Gamage (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7661-8390)
- Ángel Acevedo-Duque (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8774-3282)
- Judit Oláh (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2247-1711)
- Kayhan Tajeddini (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5087-8212)
Publication Details
- Journal
- British Food Journal
- Published
- 2025-05-20
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1108/bfj-12-2024-1293
- Citations
- 7
- Primary Topic
- Digital Marketing and Social Media
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 29.41