Think before you synthesize: Registered Reports for (systematic) reviews

The benefits of Registered Reports extend beyond confirmatory studies with statistically verifiable hypotheses. Their advantages and disadvantages for (systematic) reviews are explored to broaden researchers’ perspectives.

Authors

Ginette Lafit (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8227-128X)
Wim Van Den Noortgate (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4011-219X)
Lisa Peeters (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0001-0718-8160)

Institutions

KU Leuven (BE)

Publication Details

Published: 2025-05-20
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21428/1192f2f8.a30f7db4
Primary Topic: Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
Type: article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact: 0.00

Controls

|||

ALL TIME

JAN

FEB

MAR

APR

MAY

JUN

JUL

AUG

SEP

OCT

article

Think before you synthesize: Registered Reports for (systematic) reviews

Ginette Lafit, Wim Van Den Noortgate, Lisa Peeters

May 20, 2025

Meta-analysis and systematic reviews

article

Think before you synthesize: Registered Reports for (systematic) reviews

Ginette Lafit, Wim Van Den Noortgate, Lisa Peeters

May 20, 2025article en

Abstract

KU Leuven (BE)

Openalex Percentile: Top 89%

Meta-analysis and systematic reviews

DOI Open Access PDF OpenAlex

AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Think before you synthesize: Registered Reports for (systematic) reviews — Ginette Lafit, Wim Van Den Noortgate, et al. · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS