Experimental and Numerical Study on Ground Shock in Loess under Ground Surface Explosions

To study the ground shock in loess soil subjected to ground surface explosion, field tests were conducted with the scaled distance of measuring points ranging from 0.328 to 1.73 m/kg1/3. Then, a refined numerical model was established using LS-DYNA and validated by experimental results. The widely used TM 5-855-1 manual for calculating ground shock loads was critically examined, revealing limitations in predicting impulse for scaled distances longer than 0.5 m/kg1/3. Accelerations calculated by the TM 5-855-1 manual and the China empirical formula underestimated measured data, with maximal errors reaching −86% and −80.1%, respectively. The recommended tr/ta of the TM 5-855-1 manual differed significantly from experimental and numerical results. Finally, modified formulas for ground shock load calculation in loess soil subjected to ground surface explosion were proposed, which is applicable in the scaled distance ranging from 0.35 to 2.0 m/kg1/3. The modified formulas accurately predict peak pressure, impulse, and rising time, serving as valuable references for ground shock load calculations in loess soil.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Geomechanics
Published
2025-05-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1061/ijgnai.gmeng-10776
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Structural Response to Dynamic Loads
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.91
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Experimental and Numerical Study on Ground Shock in Loess under Ground Surface Explosions

Yahao Pan, Haimin Qian, Zhouhong Zong
2 citations
International Journal of Geomechanics
Structural Response to Dynamic Loads
1.91
article

Experimental and Numerical Study on Ground Shock in Loess under Ground Surface Explosions

Yahao Pan, Haimin Qian, Zhouhong Zong
article en
2 citations

Abstract

To study the ground shock in loess soil subjected to ground surface explosion, field tests were conducted with the scaled distance of measuring points ranging from 0.328 to 1.73 m/kg1/3. Then, a refined numerical model was established using LS-DYNA and validated by experimental results. The widely used TM 5-855-1 manual for calculating ground shock loads was critically examined, revealing limitations in predicting impulse for scaled distances longer than 0.5 m/kg1/3. Accelerations calculated by the TM 5-855-1 manual and the China empirical formula underestimated measured data, with maximal errors reaching −86% and −80.1%, respectively. The recommended tr/ta of the TM 5-855-1 manual differed significantly from experimental and numerical results. Finally, modified formulas for ground shock load calculation in loess soil subjected to ground surface explosion were proposed, which is applicable in the scaled distance ranging from 0.35 to 2.0 m/kg1/3. The modified formulas accurately predict peak pressure, impulse, and rising time, serving as valuable references for ground shock load calculations in loess soil.

International Journal of GeomechanicsVol. 25(8)
Southeast University (BD), City University (BD)
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Structural Response to Dynamic Loads
1.91
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.