An Evermore Geoeconomic European Union? Exploring Critical Perspectives for Future Research

Abstract In response to a more contentious and geopolitically fractious international environment, the European Union's (EU) approach to international economic policies has in recent years undergone a significant shift, often referred to as the EU's ‘geoeconomic turn’. Whilst valuable academic and policy work has explored this ongoing shift, there is a general tendency to see geoeconomics as either required and beneficial or a sad imposition on a reluctant EU in a changing global economic landscape. However, as geoeconomics is likely here to stay, we argue that it is high time for EU studies to engage more critically with this geoeconomic turn. This entails a deeper examination of the geoeconomic turn's broader implications for social inequalities, exploitation, power disparities and changing hierarchies within the EU and internationally. More concretely, we put forward four perspectives that could inform future critical research on the geoeconomic turn. Drawing on work in other disciplines and at the EU studies' fringes, we first argue for critically historicising the geoeconomic turn's supposed newness and for recentring human development in thinking about the EU's geoeconomic turn. We then explore the changing modalities of business power entailed by the geoeconomic turn and the importance of studying its social purpose. By addressing these underexplored questions, we aim to provide a first, non‐exhaustive step for future research towards a more critical understanding of the complexities and potential power consequences of the EU's evolving economic strategy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JCMS Journal of Common Market Studies
Published
2025-05-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.13741
Citations
3
Primary Topic
European Union Policy and Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
25.57

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

An Evermore Geoeconomic European Union? Exploring Critical Perspectives for Future Research

Jaša Veselinovič, Sjorre Couvreur
3 citations
JCMS Journal of Common Market Studies
European Union Policy and Governance
25.57
article

An Evermore Geoeconomic European Union? Exploring Critical Perspectives for Future Research

Jaša Veselinovič, Sjorre Couvreur
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Abstract In response to a more contentious and geopolitically fractious international environment, the European Union's (EU) approach to international economic policies has in recent years undergone a significant shift, often referred to as the EU's ‘geoeconomic turn’. Whilst valuable academic and policy work has explored this ongoing shift, there is a general tendency to see geoeconomics as either required and beneficial or a sad imposition on a reluctant EU in a changing global economic landscape. However, as geoeconomics is likely here to stay, we argue that it is high time for EU studies to engage more critically with this geoeconomic turn. This entails a deeper examination of the geoeconomic turn's broader implications for social inequalities, exploitation, power disparities and changing hierarchies within the EU and internationally. More concretely, we put forward four perspectives that could inform future critical research on the geoeconomic turn. Drawing on work in other disciplines and at the EU studies' fringes, we first argue for critically historicising the geoeconomic turn's supposed newness and for recentring human development in thinking about the EU's geoeconomic turn. We then explore the changing modalities of business power entailed by the geoeconomic turn and the importance of studying its social purpose. By addressing these underexplored questions, we aim to provide a first, non‐exhaustive step for future research towards a more critical understanding of the complexities and potential power consequences of the EU's evolving economic strategy.

JCMS Journal of Common Market StudiesVol. 64(1)
Ghent University (BE)
Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
European Union Policy and Governance
25.57
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.