Trials and Tribulations of Chemodynamical Tagging: Investigating the Recovery of Open Clusters in the Gaia Data Release 3 and GALAH Data Release 4 Catalogs

Abstract Chemodynamical tagging has been suggested as a powerful tool to trace stars back to their birth clusters. However, the efficacy of chemodynamical tagging as a means to recover individual stellar clusters is still under debate. In this study, we present a detailed investigation of chemodynamical tagging of open clusters using both dynamical and chemical data from the Gaia Data Release 3 and GALAH Data Release 4 surveys, respectively. Using a sample of open clusters and mock field stars, we conduct a bootstrap analysis to evaluate every unique combination of orbital components ( E , J R , J ϕ , J Z ) and chemical abundances ([X/Fe] for O, Na, Mg, Al, Si, K, Ca, Sc, Ti, Cr, Mn, Ni, Cu, Y, and Ba) on how well they recover open clusters when used as parameters in the clustering algorithm HDBSCAN. We find that using primarily dynamical orbital parameters leads to the highest recovery rate of open cluster stars. Nevertheless, even employing the best performing parameter combinations leads to low open cluster recovery rates. We find that, in most cases, chemodynamical tagging of open clusters using blind clustering algorithms is not efficient, which is in line with previous theoretical and observational work. However, we show that the addition of cuts based on metallicity, age, and birth radius in order to reduce the size of the clustering catalog can marginally improve the recovery rate of open clusters.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The Astrophysical Journal
Published
2025-05-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/adccbc
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.15
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Trials and Tribulations of Chemodynamical Tagging: Investigating the Recovery of Open Clusters in the Gaia Data Release 3 and GALAH Data Release 4 Catalogs

Nicholas Barth, Zachary R. Claytor, Jamie Tayar, Rana Ezzeddine et al.
1 citations
The Astrophysical Journal
Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
1.15
article

Trials and Tribulations of Chemodynamical Tagging: Investigating the Recovery of Open Clusters in the Gaia Data Release 3 and GALAH Data Release 4 Catalogs

Nicholas Barth, Zachary R. Claytor, Jamie Tayar, Rana Ezzeddine, Leslie M. Morales, David I. Méndez, Yuxi Lu
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Chemodynamical tagging has been suggested as a powerful tool to trace stars back to their birth clusters. However, the efficacy of chemodynamical tagging as a means to recover individual stellar clusters is still under debate. In this study, we present a detailed investigation of chemodynamical tagging of open clusters using both dynamical and chemical data from the Gaia Data Release 3 and GALAH Data Release 4 surveys, respectively. Using a sample of open clusters and mock field stars, we conduct a bootstrap analysis to evaluate every unique combination of orbital components ( E , J R , J ϕ , J Z ) and chemical abundances ([X/Fe] for O, Na, Mg, Al, Si, K, Ca, Sc, Ti, Cr, Mn, Ni, Cu, Y, and Ba) on how well they recover open clusters when used as parameters in the clustering algorithm HDBSCAN. We find that using primarily dynamical orbital parameters leads to the highest recovery rate of open cluster stars. Nevertheless, even employing the best performing parameter combinations leads to low open cluster recovery rates. We find that, in most cases, chemodynamical tagging of open clusters using blind clustering algorithms is not efficient, which is in line with previous theoretical and observational work. However, we show that the addition of cuts based on metallicity, age, and birth radius in order to reduce the size of the clustering catalog can marginally improve the recovery rate of open clusters.

The Astrophysical JournalVol. 985(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
1.15
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.