The Material and Textual Value of Manuscript and Print Binding Waste <sup>☆</sup>

Abstract In 2019, the Foundation of Christ's Hospital at Lincoln made a bequest of early printed books to the Bodleian Library. The collection is rich in sixteenth‐century tooled bindings, many of which preserve manuscript and printed waste in the form of pastedowns, endleaves and endleaf guards. Using this collection as a case study, this article explores the interactions between manuscript and print in the bindings of sixteenth‐century books. Today, we understand ‘waste’ to mean ‘refuse matter’ (OED, ‘waste, n .’, III.11.a.), that is, material which, no longer fit for purpose, has been consigned to the scrapheap. In the early modern period, waste paper and parchment were not ‘unserviceable materials’ or ‘useless by‐products’, but rather material commodities fit for a variety of secondary uses, which included the binding of other books. However, rather than simply looking backwards from these surviving scraps in an attempt to reconstruct what has been lost, in this article, I propose that the printed and manuscript fragments that mingle in the bindings of early modern books are generative, focusing ideas about ‘the book’ as both immaterial, ideal and whole as well as material, real and susceptible to destruction and decay.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Renaissance Studies
Published
2025-05-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/rest.12991
Primary Topic
Cultural and Historical Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Material and Textual Value of Manuscript and Print Binding Waste ☆

Tamara Atkin
Renaissance Studies
Cultural and Historical Studies
article

The Material and Textual Value of Manuscript and Print Binding Waste ☆

Tamara Atkin
article en

Abstract

Abstract In 2019, the Foundation of Christ's Hospital at Lincoln made a bequest of early printed books to the Bodleian Library. The collection is rich in sixteenth‐century tooled bindings, many of which preserve manuscript and printed waste in the form of pastedowns, endleaves and endleaf guards. Using this collection as a case study, this article explores the interactions between manuscript and print in the bindings of sixteenth‐century books. Today, we understand ‘waste’ to mean ‘refuse matter’ (OED, ‘waste, n .’, III.11.a.), that is, material which, no longer fit for purpose, has been consigned to the scrapheap. In the early modern period, waste paper and parchment were not ‘unserviceable materials’ or ‘useless by‐products’, but rather material commodities fit for a variety of secondary uses, which included the binding of other books. However, rather than simply looking backwards from these surviving scraps in an attempt to reconstruct what has been lost, in this article, I propose that the printed and manuscript fragments that mingle in the bindings of early modern books are generative, focusing ideas about ‘the book’ as both immaterial, ideal and whole as well as material, real and susceptible to destruction and decay.

Renaissance StudiesVol. 40(2)
University of Oxford (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Cultural and Historical Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.