The Development of Indicators and Approaches for Developing Innovative Leadership of World-Class Standard School Administrators

This research aimed to develop indicators and approaches for developing innovative leadership of world-class standard school administrators. The research methodology used was a multi-phase mixed method. The research was divided into 4 phases: Phase 1: Development of innovative leadership indicators by studying documents and research related to innovative leadership principles and theories and interviewing experts, and Phase 2: Testing the consistency of the developed innovative leadership structural relationship model with empirical data. The samples consisted of 500 administrators, 500 academic department heads, and 500 teachers, totaling 1,500 people, from 500 world-class international standard schools nationwide using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), Phase 3: Creating and developing approaches and manuals for using innovative leadership development approaches, using a synthesis of research results from phases 1 and 2 and interviewing experts, and Phase 4: Evaluating the approaches and manuals for using innovative leadership development approaches, using Stufflebeam’s evaluation framework for propriety, feasibility, and utility. The research results found that 1) the innovative leadership indicators of world-class standard school administrators consisted of 5 main components, 17 sub-components, and 75 indicators, namely (1) the innovative vision, with 3 sub-components and 9 indicators; (2) innovative risk-taking, with 3 sub-components and 14 indicators; (3) Creating an Innovative Network, with 4 sub-components and 19 indicators; (4) innovative creativity, with 4 components and 18 indicators; and (5) Innovative change, with 3 sub-components and 15 indicators, 2) The structural relationship model of innovative leadership indicators has statistical values consistent with empirical data (Chi-square = 108.31, df = 95, P-value = 0.16561, c2/df = 1.14, RMSEA = 0.034), 3) The innovative leadership development approaches consist of 5 dimensions, 81 practices and the manual for using the innovative leadership development consists of 4 sections, and 4) The results of the evaluation of the approaches and the manual for using the approaches according to the evaluation standards were found to be at the highest level in all 3 aspects: propriety (x= 4.94, SD =0.23), feasibility (x= 4.92, SD =0.28), and utility (x= 4.89, SD =0.32).

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Education Studies
Published
2025-05-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v18n3p38
Primary Topic
Educational Methods and Teacher Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Development of Indicators and Approaches for Developing Innovative Leadership of World-Class Standard School Administrators

Chaiyuth Sirisuthi, Pha Aksornsua, Sawasd Jantrairat
International Education Studies
Educational Methods and Teacher Development
article

The Development of Indicators and Approaches for Developing Innovative Leadership of World-Class Standard School Administrators

Chaiyuth Sirisuthi, Pha Aksornsua, Sawasd Jantrairat
article en

Abstract

This research aimed to develop indicators and approaches for developing innovative leadership of world-class standard school administrators. The research methodology used was a multi-phase mixed method. The research was divided into 4 phases: Phase 1: Development of innovative leadership indicators by studying documents and research related to innovative leadership principles and theories and interviewing experts, and Phase 2: Testing the consistency of the developed innovative leadership structural relationship model with empirical data. The samples consisted of 500 administrators, 500 academic department heads, and 500 teachers, totaling 1,500 people, from 500 world-class international standard schools nationwide using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), Phase 3: Creating and developing approaches and manuals for using innovative leadership development approaches, using a synthesis of research results from phases 1 and 2 and interviewing experts, and Phase 4: Evaluating the approaches and manuals for using innovative leadership development approaches, using Stufflebeam’s evaluation framework for propriety, feasibility, and utility. The research results found that 1) the innovative leadership indicators of world-class standard school administrators consisted of 5 main components, 17 sub-components, and 75 indicators, namely (1) the innovative vision, with 3 sub-components and 9 indicators; (2) innovative risk-taking, with 3 sub-components and 14 indicators; (3) Creating an Innovative Network, with 4 sub-components and 19 indicators; (4) innovative creativity, with 4 components and 18 indicators; and (5) Innovative change, with 3 sub-components and 15 indicators, 2) The structural relationship model of innovative leadership indicators has statistical values consistent with empirical data (Chi-square = 108.31, df = 95, P-value = 0.16561, c2/df = 1.14, RMSEA = 0.034), 3) The innovative leadership development approaches consist of 5 dimensions, 81 practices and the manual for using the innovative leadership development consists of 4 sections, and 4) The results of the evaluation of the approaches and the manual for using the approaches according to the evaluation standards were found to be at the highest level in all 3 aspects: propriety (x= 4.94, SD =0.23), feasibility (x= 4.92, SD =0.28), and utility (x= 4.89, SD =0.32).

International Education StudiesVol. 18(3)
Openalex Percentile: Top 85%
Educational Methods and Teacher Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.