Understanding the Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices of Young Obstetricians and Gynecologists (OBGYNs) in Menopause Management: Unveiling Insights From India

Background Menopause management poses a substantial public health challenge in India, characterized by a large and growing population of aging women. With more women undergoing this transition, there is growing interest in addressing its health implications. Despite its significance, there is a noticeable deficiency in the data concerning the knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) among young Indian obstetricians and gynecologists (OBGYNs) regarding menopause management. Objectives As part of a pan-India investigation, this research aims to systematically assess the KAP related to menopause management among young OBGYNs by identifying the knowledge gap and evaluating the consistency of clinical practices with current guidelines. Methodology A comprehensive nationwide cross-sectional survey was conducted utilizing the CLIRNET digital platform, which facilitates collaboration and knowledge exchange among healthcare professionals in India. Our survey allowed open voluntary participation from 31,103 OBGYNs, of which 514 respondents met the inclusion criteria. Participants completed a detailed online questionnaire. Results The majority of respondents (474 of 514, 92.2%) correctly identified vasomotor symptoms as a primary complaint of menopause. Significant variations in knowledge and practice were observed based on years of experience. Among those with 0-3 years of practice, 54.1% accurately identified the average age of menopause in India, compared to 46.2% among those with 7-10 years of experience. In terms of management, 83.1% of OBGYNs with 0-3 years of experience recommended systemic estrogen combined with progestogen for vasomotor symptoms, whereas this figure dropped to 77.2% among the comparatively more experienced (7-10 years) cohort. Interestingly, younger OBGYNs were less likely to support the early initiation of menopausal hormone therapy (MHT), with only 30.4% in favor, compared to 48.9% among those with 7-10 years of experience. Conclusion The findings of this study reveal a marked heterogeneity in the knowledge base and clinical practices pertaining to menopause management among OBGYNs in India. This observed variability underscores the pressing need to develop and implement targeted, experience-sensitive educational interventions designed to address existing knowledge gaps and standardize the quality of menopause care across diverse clinical settings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cureus
Published
2025-05-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.84444
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Menopause: Health Impacts and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.29
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Understanding the Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices of Young Obstetricians and Gynecologists (OBGYNs) in Menopause Management: Unveiling Insights From India

A Bondía, Jamuna Devi Gudidevuni, Apeksha Thakre, Monika Bhanushali
1 citations
Cureus
Menopause: Health Impacts and Treatments
1.29
article

Understanding the Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices of Young Obstetricians and Gynecologists (OBGYNs) in Menopause Management: Unveiling Insights From India

A Bondía, Jamuna Devi Gudidevuni, Apeksha Thakre, Monika Bhanushali
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Background Menopause management poses a substantial public health challenge in India, characterized by a large and growing population of aging women. With more women undergoing this transition, there is growing interest in addressing its health implications. Despite its significance, there is a noticeable deficiency in the data concerning the knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) among young Indian obstetricians and gynecologists (OBGYNs) regarding menopause management. Objectives As part of a pan-India investigation, this research aims to systematically assess the KAP related to menopause management among young OBGYNs by identifying the knowledge gap and evaluating the consistency of clinical practices with current guidelines. Methodology A comprehensive nationwide cross-sectional survey was conducted utilizing the CLIRNET digital platform, which facilitates collaboration and knowledge exchange among healthcare professionals in India. Our survey allowed open voluntary participation from 31,103 OBGYNs, of which 514 respondents met the inclusion criteria. Participants completed a detailed online questionnaire. Results The majority of respondents (474 of 514, 92.2%) correctly identified vasomotor symptoms as a primary complaint of menopause. Significant variations in knowledge and practice were observed based on years of experience. Among those with 0-3 years of practice, 54.1% accurately identified the average age of menopause in India, compared to 46.2% among those with 7-10 years of experience. In terms of management, 83.1% of OBGYNs with 0-3 years of experience recommended systemic estrogen combined with progestogen for vasomotor symptoms, whereas this figure dropped to 77.2% among the comparatively more experienced (7-10 years) cohort. Interestingly, younger OBGYNs were less likely to support the early initiation of menopausal hormone therapy (MHT), with only 30.4% in favor, compared to 48.9% among those with 7-10 years of experience. Conclusion The findings of this study reveal a marked heterogeneity in the knowledge base and clinical practices pertaining to menopause management among OBGYNs in India. This observed variability underscores the pressing need to develop and implement targeted, experience-sensitive educational interventions designed to address existing knowledge gaps and standardize the quality of menopause care across diverse clinical settings.

CureusVol. 17(5)
Yashoda Hospital (IN), Cloudnine (IN), Pfizer (India) (IN)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Menopause: Health Impacts and Treatments
1.29
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.