Research on performance evaluation systems from a social-psychological perspective: A regional financial institution case study

This study examines the social-psychological dimensions of performance evaluation systems in regional equity trading centers, using Henan Zhongyuan Equity Exchange Center as a case study. Through comprehensive empirical analysis of data from 2019 to 2023, the research employs multiple methodological approaches to investigate how social dynamics and psychological factors influence evaluation effectiveness. The findings reveal significant positive effects of evaluation systems on employee psychological well-being and organizational climate (β = 0.385, p < 0.01), with the relationship mediated by social support systems (β = 0.124), interpersonal trust (β = 0.078), and collective organizational identity (β = 0.047). Social context analysis demonstrates stronger effects in departments with high psychological safety and collaborative cultures. The moderation analysis identifies organizational support as a crucial amplifying factor, with high support environments showing substantially stronger effects (β = 0.70) compared to low support conditions (β = 0.30). Dynamic analysis confirms the temporal stability of these social-psychological relationships. These findings contribute to both theoretical understanding and practical implementation of psychologically informed performance evaluation systems in organizations, with implications extending beyond equity trading centers to various financial institutions and corporate environments where psychological safety and performance evaluation intersect.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Environment and Social Psychology
Published
2025-04-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.59429/esp.v10i4.3428
Primary Topic
Accounting and Organizational Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Research on performance evaluation systems from a social-psychological perspective: A regional financial institution case study

LI Ming-zhe, Grace R. Tobias
Environment and Social Psychology
Accounting and Organizational Management
article

Research on performance evaluation systems from a social-psychological perspective: A regional financial institution case study

LI Ming-zhe, Grace R. Tobias
article en

Abstract

This study examines the social-psychological dimensions of performance evaluation systems in regional equity trading centers, using Henan Zhongyuan Equity Exchange Center as a case study. Through comprehensive empirical analysis of data from 2019 to 2023, the research employs multiple methodological approaches to investigate how social dynamics and psychological factors influence evaluation effectiveness. The findings reveal significant positive effects of evaluation systems on employee psychological well-being and organizational climate (β = 0.385, p < 0.01), with the relationship mediated by social support systems (β = 0.124), interpersonal trust (β = 0.078), and collective organizational identity (β = 0.047). Social context analysis demonstrates stronger effects in departments with high psychological safety and collaborative cultures. The moderation analysis identifies organizational support as a crucial amplifying factor, with high support environments showing substantially stronger effects (β = 0.70) compared to low support conditions (β = 0.30). Dynamic analysis confirms the temporal stability of these social-psychological relationships. These findings contribute to both theoretical understanding and practical implementation of psychologically informed performance evaluation systems in organizations, with implications extending beyond equity trading centers to various financial institutions and corporate environments where psychological safety and performance evaluation intersect.

Environment and Social PsychologyVol. 10(4)
Openalex Percentile: Top 82%
Accounting and Organizational Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.