One Hundred Years, and Counting: Billy Budd

Abstract: A brief (and therefore inadequate) summing of the first fifty years of the critical reception, editing, and adaptation of the posthumously published novella Billy Budd introduces certain critical challenges still unmet regarding the radical instability of Melville’s “inside narrative” and his narrator who never gets fully “inside” his characters. In giving readers access to Melville’s manuscript revisions, the Melville Electronic Library’s 2019 fluid-text edition of Billy Budd offers a platform for studying the roll of revision in the development of Melville’s aesthetics of incompletion. A cluster of revisions featuring Liverpool offers evidence of the narrator’s struggle to get “inside.” Further critical problems are articulated in two final “user cases”: 1) Did Melville “invent” the Handsome Sailor trope? and 2) Should a scholarly edition like MEL invite artists to contribute new (and long overdue) adaptations of Billy Budd in play, film, and opera?

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Leviathan
Published
2025-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1353/lvn.2025.a961118
Primary Topic
Philosophy, History, and Historiography
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

One Hundred Years, and Counting: Billy Budd

John Bryant
Leviathan
Philosophy, History, and Historiography
article

One Hundred Years, and Counting: Billy Budd

John Bryant
article en

Abstract

Abstract: A brief (and therefore inadequate) summing of the first fifty years of the critical reception, editing, and adaptation of the posthumously published novella Billy Budd introduces certain critical challenges still unmet regarding the radical instability of Melville’s “inside narrative” and his narrator who never gets fully “inside” his characters. In giving readers access to Melville’s manuscript revisions, the Melville Electronic Library’s 2019 fluid-text edition of Billy Budd offers a platform for studying the roll of revision in the development of Melville’s aesthetics of incompletion. A cluster of revisions featuring Liverpool offers evidence of the narrator’s struggle to get “inside.” Further critical problems are articulated in two final “user cases”: 1) Did Melville “invent” the Handsome Sailor trope? and 2) Should a scholarly edition like MEL invite artists to contribute new (and long overdue) adaptations of Billy Budd in play, film, and opera?

LeviathanVol. 27(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Philosophy, History, and Historiography
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.