Criminal Policy Toward the Crime of Defamation in Cyberspace Through the Use of Deepfake AI

Currently, humanity is experiencing rapid advancements in science and technology. Information and communication technology has undergone significant developments, particularly with the emergence of Artificial Intelligence (AI). This progress has ushered in the digital era, where people interact in cyberspace through social media platforms that utilize AI. While the use of AI in social media brings positive impacts by enhancing interactions in cyberspace, it also presents the potential for cybercrimes, including defamation through AI-based technology known as Deepfake. Several notable cases of defamation using Deepfake AI have occurred, such as the case of Raffaela Spone in the United States, who sent defamatory Deepfake content targeting members of the Victory Vipers cheerleading team; the manipulated video of Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy; the Deepfake video of Indian actress Rashmika Mandanna wearing revealing clothing; and cases involving manipulated Deepfake videos of Indonesian public figures such as Prabowo Subianto, Gibran Rakabuming Raka, and Sri Mulyani. In Indonesia, there is still a lack of clear regulation concerning defamation through the use of Deepfake AI and how to address such crimes through criminal policy. This study aims to examine efforts to combat cyber defamation using Deepfake AI by applying both penal and non-penal criminal policy approaches. The research employs a normative juridical method, using secondary data sources and deductive analysis. The findings show that efforts to address the crime of cyber defamation using Deepfake AI can be implemented through penal policy using formulation strategies, and through non-penal policy by eliminating criminogenic factors contributing to cyber defamation with Deepfake AI. Penal policy countermeasures can be pursued under Law No. 11 of 2008 in conjunction with Law No. 19 of 2016, specifically Article 27 paragraph (3). Non-penal approaches involve the use of Deepfake AI detection technologies, protection of digital identities, digital literacy education, and the enhancement of personal data security.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Jurnal Akta
Published
2025-05-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.30659/akta.v12i2.44884
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Digital and Cyber Forensics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.25
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Criminal Policy Toward the Crime of Defamation in Cyberspace Through the Use of Deepfake AI

Wenggedes Frensh
1 citations
Jurnal Akta
Digital and Cyber Forensics
3.25
article

Criminal Policy Toward the Crime of Defamation in Cyberspace Through the Use of Deepfake AI

Wenggedes Frensh
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Currently, humanity is experiencing rapid advancements in science and technology. Information and communication technology has undergone significant developments, particularly with the emergence of Artificial Intelligence (AI). This progress has ushered in the digital era, where people interact in cyberspace through social media platforms that utilize AI. While the use of AI in social media brings positive impacts by enhancing interactions in cyberspace, it also presents the potential for cybercrimes, including defamation through AI-based technology known as Deepfake. Several notable cases of defamation using Deepfake AI have occurred, such as the case of Raffaela Spone in the United States, who sent defamatory Deepfake content targeting members of the Victory Vipers cheerleading team; the manipulated video of Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy; the Deepfake video of Indian actress Rashmika Mandanna wearing revealing clothing; and cases involving manipulated Deepfake videos of Indonesian public figures such as Prabowo Subianto, Gibran Rakabuming Raka, and Sri Mulyani. In Indonesia, there is still a lack of clear regulation concerning defamation through the use of Deepfake AI and how to address such crimes through criminal policy. This study aims to examine efforts to combat cyber defamation using Deepfake AI by applying both penal and non-penal criminal policy approaches. The research employs a normative juridical method, using secondary data sources and deductive analysis. The findings show that efforts to address the crime of cyber defamation using Deepfake AI can be implemented through penal policy using formulation strategies, and through non-penal policy by eliminating criminogenic factors contributing to cyber defamation with Deepfake AI. Penal policy countermeasures can be pursued under Law No. 11 of 2008 in conjunction with Law No. 19 of 2016, specifically Article 27 paragraph (3). Non-penal approaches involve the use of Deepfake AI detection technologies, protection of digital identities, digital literacy education, and the enhancement of personal data security.

Jurnal AktaVol. 12(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Digital and Cyber Forensics
3.25
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.