“Towards the advancement of medical knowledge”: Tibetan Eye Surgery and Eighteenth-Century Colonial Knowledge Production

Abstract: In 1774, East India Company Governor-General Warren Hastings commissioned an expedition to Tibet. Much has been written about the mission, but little is known about Alexander Hamilton, who joined as assistant-surgeon. Hamilton described Tibetan eye surgery as both “further behind Europeans” and “more successful than the one we follow.” Using comparative methods and deep contextualization, this article reads the contradictions in Hamilton’s writings alongside eighteenth-century Tibetan ophthalmology to reveal an Enlightenment-era tension between seeking new knowledge and substantiating Britain’s progress narrative. Hamilton and the following two British medical men in Tibet—Robert Saunders and Thomas Manning—were aware that claims of British medical superiority were unfounded. Yet, their willful ignorance of Tibetan medicine resulted in the non-transfer of knowledge, facilitating the rise of imperial confidence.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Colonialism and Colonial History
Published
2025-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1353/cch.2025.a960519
Primary Topic
History of Science and Medicine
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

“Towards the advancement of medical knowledge”: Tibetan Eye Surgery and Eighteenth-Century Colonial Knowledge Production

Jocelyn Zimmerman
Journal of Colonialism and Colonial History
History of Science and Medicine
article

“Towards the advancement of medical knowledge”: Tibetan Eye Surgery and Eighteenth-Century Colonial Knowledge Production

Jocelyn Zimmerman
article en

Abstract

Abstract: In 1774, East India Company Governor-General Warren Hastings commissioned an expedition to Tibet. Much has been written about the mission, but little is known about Alexander Hamilton, who joined as assistant-surgeon. Hamilton described Tibetan eye surgery as both “further behind Europeans” and “more successful than the one we follow.” Using comparative methods and deep contextualization, this article reads the contradictions in Hamilton’s writings alongside eighteenth-century Tibetan ophthalmology to reveal an Enlightenment-era tension between seeking new knowledge and substantiating Britain’s progress narrative. Hamilton and the following two British medical men in Tibet—Robert Saunders and Thomas Manning—were aware that claims of British medical superiority were unfounded. Yet, their willful ignorance of Tibetan medicine resulted in the non-transfer of knowledge, facilitating the rise of imperial confidence.

Journal of Colonialism and Colonial HistoryVol. 26(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 85%
History of Science and Medicine
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.