Moby-Dick 's Eschatological Animal Apocalypse: Whales in Spirit, Whales in Flesh

Abstract: This essay situates itself within religious and ecological Melvillean criticism to rethink the whale's symbolic allness in Herman Melville's novel Moby-Dick; or, the Whale as symptomatic of anthropocentric or human-centered discourses surrounding extinction and extraction. I argue that these approaches are simultaneously correct and incomplete insofar as Moby-Dick textualizes the whale's multivalent status as religious symbol, agential animal, and economic product. Whales, instead, are a fleshly nothingness of violently dismembered, dismembering bodies in what I view as an animalized apocalypse. By deploying a materialist reading of messianic eschatology, this essay demonstrates that Melville critiques anthropocentric abstraction with three biblical tropes associated with disembodied prophecy, an industrialized Book of Nature, and the representation of Moby Dick as a vengeful God. I read Melville with illustrations by Matt Kish because his revisualization puts Moby-Dick 's religious investment into unstable textual contexts, emphasizing how whales' abstracted physicality simultaneously enfleshes and complicates cultural discourses. I define Melville's animal apocalypse, therefore, as the revelation that human conceptions of the nonhuman world are fictions based in human mastery. But rather than salvation, the novel envisions a de-anthropocentric, if limited, future based in textual and material salvage.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Leviathan
Published
2025-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1353/lvn.2025.a960348
Primary Topic
Freedom of Expression and Defamation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Moby-Dick 's Eschatological Animal Apocalypse: Whales in Spirit, Whales in Flesh

Sarah Leilani Parijs
Leviathan
Freedom of Expression and Defamation
article

Moby-Dick 's Eschatological Animal Apocalypse: Whales in Spirit, Whales in Flesh

Sarah Leilani Parijs
article en

Abstract

Abstract: This essay situates itself within religious and ecological Melvillean criticism to rethink the whale's symbolic allness in Herman Melville's novel Moby-Dick; or, the Whale as symptomatic of anthropocentric or human-centered discourses surrounding extinction and extraction. I argue that these approaches are simultaneously correct and incomplete insofar as Moby-Dick textualizes the whale's multivalent status as religious symbol, agential animal, and economic product. Whales, instead, are a fleshly nothingness of violently dismembered, dismembering bodies in what I view as an animalized apocalypse. By deploying a materialist reading of messianic eschatology, this essay demonstrates that Melville critiques anthropocentric abstraction with three biblical tropes associated with disembodied prophecy, an industrialized Book of Nature, and the representation of Moby Dick as a vengeful God. I read Melville with illustrations by Matt Kish because his revisualization puts Moby-Dick 's religious investment into unstable textual contexts, emphasizing how whales' abstracted physicality simultaneously enfleshes and complicates cultural discourses. I define Melville's animal apocalypse, therefore, as the revelation that human conceptions of the nonhuman world are fictions based in human mastery. But rather than salvation, the novel envisions a de-anthropocentric, if limited, future based in textual and material salvage.

LeviathanVol. 27(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 82%
Freedom of Expression and Defamation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.