“Right on the ground”: signalling authentic brand inclusivity to LGBTQ+ consumers

Purpose Embedded in signalling theory, this study aims to evaluate authentic brand inclusivity from a customer-centric perspective. It provides an emic perspective on diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) in brand management practices by focusing on LGBTQ+ consumers. Design/methodology/approach Deploying a sequential qualitative research design, Study One identifies the organisational and brand practices that LGBTQ+ consumers use to judge authenticity and brand inclusivity. In Study Two, in-depth interviews are used to examine perceptions of how the practices uncovered in Study One are implemented, signalling perceptions of whether brands are authentically LGBTQ+ inclusive. Findings Study One uncovers five areas (marketing communications, products/brands, ownership and management, advocacy initiatives and internal marketing) that inform LGBTQ+ consumers’ evaluations of authentic brand inclusivity. Study Two uncovers four Cs (collaboration, consistency, conviction and congruence) that underpin authentic brand inclusivity evaluations and the notion of synchronicity that underpins it. Research limitations/implications Both studies are qualitative and based on Western samples. The findings and proposed characteristics of authentic brand inclusivity need to be tested quantitatively. The proposed framework can inform the basis for scale development. Practical implications The findings highlight how brands can be managed to be authentically inclusive for LGBTQ+ consumers. The authors identify organisational and brand practices that support inclusivity and can be easily implemented by practitioners. Social implications DEI practices that support minority groups can improve their feelings of inclusivity and wellbeing. The study identifies how LGBTQ+ consumers evaluate brands on their authenticity and inclusivity. Originality/value The study offers a framework for managing authentic brand inclusivity from a customer-centric perspective focused on normalising LGBTQ+ identities. The framework uniquely integrates what brands need to do and how they need to do it, to be perceived as authentically inclusive for LGBTQ+ people.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Product & Brand Management
Published
2025-05-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/jpbm-06-2024-5271
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.29
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

“Right on the ground”: signalling authentic brand inclusivity to LGBTQ+ consumers

Girish Prayag, Joya A. Kemper, Johnpaul Smith, Clifford Lewis
4 citations
Journal of Product & Brand Management
Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification
8.29
article

“Right on the ground”: signalling authentic brand inclusivity to LGBTQ+ consumers

Girish Prayag, Joya A. Kemper, Johnpaul Smith, Clifford Lewis
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Purpose Embedded in signalling theory, this study aims to evaluate authentic brand inclusivity from a customer-centric perspective. It provides an emic perspective on diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) in brand management practices by focusing on LGBTQ+ consumers. Design/methodology/approach Deploying a sequential qualitative research design, Study One identifies the organisational and brand practices that LGBTQ+ consumers use to judge authenticity and brand inclusivity. In Study Two, in-depth interviews are used to examine perceptions of how the practices uncovered in Study One are implemented, signalling perceptions of whether brands are authentically LGBTQ+ inclusive. Findings Study One uncovers five areas (marketing communications, products/brands, ownership and management, advocacy initiatives and internal marketing) that inform LGBTQ+ consumers’ evaluations of authentic brand inclusivity. Study Two uncovers four Cs (collaboration, consistency, conviction and congruence) that underpin authentic brand inclusivity evaluations and the notion of synchronicity that underpins it. Research limitations/implications Both studies are qualitative and based on Western samples. The findings and proposed characteristics of authentic brand inclusivity need to be tested quantitatively. The proposed framework can inform the basis for scale development. Practical implications The findings highlight how brands can be managed to be authentically inclusive for LGBTQ+ consumers. The authors identify organisational and brand practices that support inclusivity and can be easily implemented by practitioners. Social implications DEI practices that support minority groups can improve their feelings of inclusivity and wellbeing. The study identifies how LGBTQ+ consumers evaluate brands on their authenticity and inclusivity. Originality/value The study offers a framework for managing authentic brand inclusivity from a customer-centric perspective focused on normalising LGBTQ+ identities. The framework uniquely integrates what brands need to do and how they need to do it, to be perceived as authentically inclusive for LGBTQ+ people.

Journal of Product & Brand ManagementVol. 35(2)
Charles Sturt University (AU), University of Canterbury (NZ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification
8.29
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.