A simulation‐based evaluation of internet and phone hunter harvest survey methods

Abstract Wildlife agencies are becoming increasingly interested in adopting internet‐based hunter harvest surveys to inform hunting regulations, though the efficacy of these surveys relative to their costs amidst technological advancements is uncertain. Our simulation of various survey methods builds off previous efforts to include cost analyses for both internet and phone‐based approaches based on big game harvest surveys conducted by Montana Fish, Wildlife and Parks. We discovered that a follow‐up survey, conducted following either a simple random sample or a census, effectively minimized nonresponse bias. We recommend combining internet collection with these survey strategies for surveying larger hunter populations of 50,000 or greater. This study improves our understanding of trade‐offs within accuracy and cost of internet‐based big game harvest surveys compared to phone survey methods, providing insights for their use in wildlife management.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Wildlife Society Bulletin
Published
2025-05-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/wsb.1590
Primary Topic
Economic and Environmental Valuation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A simulation‐based evaluation of internet and phone hunter harvest survey methods

Kevin M. Podruzny, Paul M. Lukacs, Kaitlyn M. Reintsma, Peter Donati
Wildlife Society Bulletin
Economic and Environmental Valuation
article

A simulation‐based evaluation of internet and phone hunter harvest survey methods

Kevin M. Podruzny, Paul M. Lukacs, Kaitlyn M. Reintsma, Peter Donati
article en

Abstract

Abstract Wildlife agencies are becoming increasingly interested in adopting internet‐based hunter harvest surveys to inform hunting regulations, though the efficacy of these surveys relative to their costs amidst technological advancements is uncertain. Our simulation of various survey methods builds off previous efforts to include cost analyses for both internet and phone‐based approaches based on big game harvest surveys conducted by Montana Fish, Wildlife and Parks. We discovered that a follow‐up survey, conducted following either a simple random sample or a census, effectively minimized nonresponse bias. We recommend combining internet collection with these survey strategies for surveying larger hunter populations of 50,000 or greater. This study improves our understanding of trade‐offs within accuracy and cost of internet‐based big game harvest surveys compared to phone survey methods, providing insights for their use in wildlife management.

Wildlife Society BulletinVol. 49(2)
Montana Fish, Wildlife & Parks (US), University of Montana (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 84%
Economic and Environmental Valuation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A simulation‐based evaluation of internet and phone hunter harvest survey methods — Kevin M. Podruzny, Paul M. Lukacs, et al. · Wildlife Society Bulletin (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS