Sensitivity of Projections of Backbone <sup>13</sup> C <sup>α</sup> / <sup>15</sup> N Chemical Shielding Along Covalent Bonds to Protein Secondary Structure—An Ab Initio Study

Statistical analysis of backbone <sup>13</sup>C<sup>α</sup> and <sup>15</sup>N chemical shielding tensors (CST) computed using the DFT-GIAO method is presented for 40 alanine residues located centrally in three-residue segments extracted from α-helical and β-sheet regions of 12 proteins with high-resolution crystal structures. Our results show that the projections of <sup>13</sup>C<sup>α</sup> shielding along the three covalent bond directions, C<sup>α</sup>-C<sup>β</sup>, C<sup>α</sup>-H<sup>α</sup>, and C<sup>α</sup>-N, exhibit significantly higher sensitivity to secondary structure than the principal components. The increased sensitivity is due to the changes in the orientation of <sup>13</sup>C<sup>α</sup> CST in the molecular frame of the two secondary structures. Similarly, the projections of backbone amide <sup>15</sup>N shielding along the covalent bonds N-H, N-C<sup>α</sup> and along the normal direction to the peptide plane have a reasonably higher sensitivity to the secondary structure than the principal components. Unlike <sup>13</sup>C<sup>α</sup> nuclei, the orientation of amide <sup>15</sup>N CST in the molecular frame is found to be invariant in the two secondary structures. The calculated amide <sup>15</sup>N chemical shielding anisotropies (CSA) are larger in helix than in sheet structure, consistent with the experimental <sup>15</sup>N chemical shift studies reported in the literature. Furthermore, two-dimensional correlation plots of backbone <sup>13</sup>C<sup>α</sup> and <sup>15</sup>N CSA parameters show a clear distinction between the two major secondary structure elements.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Magnetic Resonance in Chemistry
Published
2025-05-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/mrc.5533
Primary Topic
Advanced NMR Techniques and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Sensitivity of Projections of Backbone 13 C α / 15 N Chemical Shielding Along Covalent Bonds to Protein Secondary Structure—An Ab Initio Study

Sivakumar Paramasivam, Shaniya Sunny
Magnetic Resonance in Chemistry
Advanced NMR Techniques and Applications
article

Sensitivity of Projections of Backbone 13 C α / 15 N Chemical Shielding Along Covalent Bonds to Protein Secondary Structure—An Ab Initio Study

Sivakumar Paramasivam, Shaniya Sunny
article en

Abstract

Statistical analysis of backbone <sup>13</sup>C<sup>α</sup> and <sup>15</sup>N chemical shielding tensors (CST) computed using the DFT-GIAO method is presented for 40 alanine residues located centrally in three-residue segments extracted from α-helical and β-sheet regions of 12 proteins with high-resolution crystal structures. Our results show that the projections of <sup>13</sup>C<sup>α</sup> shielding along the three covalent bond directions, C<sup>α</sup>-C<sup>β</sup>, C<sup>α</sup>-H<sup>α</sup>, and C<sup>α</sup>-N, exhibit significantly higher sensitivity to secondary structure than the principal components. The increased sensitivity is due to the changes in the orientation of <sup>13</sup>C<sup>α</sup> CST in the molecular frame of the two secondary structures. Similarly, the projections of backbone amide <sup>15</sup>N shielding along the covalent bonds N-H, N-C<sup>α</sup> and along the normal direction to the peptide plane have a reasonably higher sensitivity to the secondary structure than the principal components. Unlike <sup>13</sup>C<sup>α</sup> nuclei, the orientation of amide <sup>15</sup>N CST in the molecular frame is found to be invariant in the two secondary structures. The calculated amide <sup>15</sup>N chemical shielding anisotropies (CSA) are larger in helix than in sheet structure, consistent with the experimental <sup>15</sup>N chemical shift studies reported in the literature. Furthermore, two-dimensional correlation plots of backbone <sup>13</sup>C<sup>α</sup> and <sup>15</sup>N CSA parameters show a clear distinction between the two major secondary structure elements.

Magnetic Resonance in ChemistryVol. 63(8)
SRM Institute of Science and Technology (IN)
SRM Institute of Science and Technology
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Advanced NMR Techniques and Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.