Capacity versus responsibility: Wealth and historical emissions as determinants of support for climate aid policy
Across both wealthy and non-wealthy nations, research finds public support for wealthy countries taking greater climate action. However, it is unclear whether this is driven by a belief that wealthier nations have greater economic capacity to respond or a greater historic responsibility for causing climate change. We explore this idea in the context of climate aid policies, which direct support to those most affected by climate change. In a correlational study (N = 292, United Kingdom), individuals who believe their nation has greater historic responsibility for climate change showed stronger support for their country providing climate aid. Two experiments provide conflicting findings. In Study 2 (N = 366, United Kingdom), we experimentally manipulated national wealth and historical emissions using a fictional nation paradigm and found that wealth was the stronger predictor of support for their country providing climate aid. In Study 3 (N = 797, South Africa) we manipulated these factors about participants' own nation and found that neither predicted support for climate aid policy, but both predicted greater support for their country implementing climate mitigation policies. Although higher capacity and responsibility increased support for mitigation policies, further efforts are needed to understand their role in shaping support for climate aid.
Authors
- Christoph Klebl (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0238-8021)
- Samantha K. Stanley (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1272-5768)
Institutions
- The University of Queensland (AU)
- UNSW Sydney (AU)
Publication Details
- Journal
- British Journal of Social Psychology
- Published
- 2025-05-19
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12899
- Citations
- 2
- Primary Topic
- Climate Change, Adaptation, Migration
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 8.40
Funders
- Australian Research Council