A plain language summary of atezolizumab compared with single-agent chemotherapy in participants with non-small cell lung cancer who should not receive platinum-based chemotherapy (the IPSOS study)

Plain Language Summary: What is this summary about? This plain language summary reports the results of the IPSOS clinical study. This study looked at treatment with atezolizumab (a type of immunotherapy) compared with single-agent chemotherapy (1 chemotherapy drug; either vinorelbine or gemcitabine) in participants receiving their first treatment for advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). People with advanced or metastatic NSCLC are often treated with platinum-based chemotherapy, which is a combination of 2 drugs. However, a doctor may decide that some people are not suitable candidates for platinum-based chemotherapy because they are too weak, or they are older and have other medical conditions. These people who should not receive platinum-based chemotherapy are often treated with 1 chemotherapy drug (single-agent chemotherapy) instead. People who are weaker, older, or have other medical problems are often not allowed to participate in clinical trials for new medicines. Therefore, these patients are not well represented in clinical trials. The IPSOS study focused on these under-represented patients. The IPSOS study compared how well atezolizumab worked compared with single-agent chemotherapy (vinorelbine or gemcitabine) in participants who should not receive platinum-based chemotherapy. Researchers collected information about the health of participants for an average of more than 3 years after starting treatment. What were the results? Compared with single-agent chemotherapy, atezolizumab improved how long participants lived after starting treatment. After 2 years, the percentage of participants still alive was twice as high in the atezolizumab group (24%) compared with the chemotherapy group (12%), despite over 50% of patients in the chemotherapy group who were still alive at 2 years receiving subsequent immunotherapy. Throughout their treatment, participants in the atezolizumab group reported no change in their health and ability to function and enjoy life, while participants in the chemotherapy group reported worsening in some of these measures. Compared with single-agent chemotherapy, atezolizumab was associated with a similar rate of serious side effects (those that were life-threatening, needed hospital care, or caused lasting problems or death) related to treatment and half the rate of severe side effects (those considered medically important by a person’s doctor; also called ‘Grade 3, 4, or 5’) related to treatment. What do the results of the study mean? Atezolizumab is now approved by the European Medicines Agency and can be used as a first treatment for people with advanced or metastatic NSCLC who aren’t able to receive platinum-based chemotherapy. This is an abstract of the Plain Language Summary of Publication article. View the full Plain Language Summary PDF of this article to read the full-text.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Future Oncology
Published
2025-05-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/14796694.2025.2500915
Primary Topic
Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A plain language summary of atezolizumab compared with single-agent chemotherapy in participants with non-small cell lung cancer who should not receive platinum-based chemotherapy (the IPSOS study)

Federico Cappuzzo, Dingzhi Huang, Siow Ming Lee, Raffaele Califano et al.
1 links
Future Oncology
Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations
article

A plain language summary of atezolizumab compared with single-agent chemotherapy in participants with non-small cell lung cancer who should not receive platinum-based chemotherapy (the IPSOS study)

Federico Cappuzzo, Dingzhi Huang, Siow Ming Lee, Raffaele Califano, Ramón Palmero, Toby Talbot, Barbara J. Gitlitz, Achim Rittmeyer, Diego Cortinovis, Martin Reck, Monika Kaul, Solange Peters, Dariusz M. Kowalski, Jessica Reyes Contreras, Anne‐Marie Baird, Baohui Han, Patricia K. Corey‐Lisle, Milena Perez Mak, Kumar Prabhash, Geoffrey Liu, Anh T. Le, Christian Schulz, David Vicente, Youyou Hu, Aleksandra Szczęsna, Stefanie Morris
article en

Abstract

Plain Language Summary: What is this summary about? This plain language summary reports the results of the IPSOS clinical study. This study looked at treatment with atezolizumab (a type of immunotherapy) compared with single-agent chemotherapy (1 chemotherapy drug; either vinorelbine or gemcitabine) in participants receiving their first treatment for advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). People with advanced or metastatic NSCLC are often treated with platinum-based chemotherapy, which is a combination of 2 drugs. However, a doctor may decide that some people are not suitable candidates for platinum-based chemotherapy because they are too weak, or they are older and have other medical conditions. These people who should not receive platinum-based chemotherapy are often treated with 1 chemotherapy drug (single-agent chemotherapy) instead. People who are weaker, older, or have other medical problems are often not allowed to participate in clinical trials for new medicines. Therefore, these patients are not well represented in clinical trials. The IPSOS study focused on these under-represented patients. The IPSOS study compared how well atezolizumab worked compared with single-agent chemotherapy (vinorelbine or gemcitabine) in participants who should not receive platinum-based chemotherapy. Researchers collected information about the health of participants for an average of more than 3 years after starting treatment. What were the results? Compared with single-agent chemotherapy, atezolizumab improved how long participants lived after starting treatment. After 2 years, the percentage of participants still alive was twice as high in the atezolizumab group (24%) compared with the chemotherapy group (12%), despite over 50% of patients in the chemotherapy group who were still alive at 2 years receiving subsequent immunotherapy. Throughout their treatment, participants in the atezolizumab group reported no change in their health and ability to function and enjoy life, while participants in the chemotherapy group reported worsening in some of these measures. Compared with single-agent chemotherapy, atezolizumab was associated with a similar rate of serious side effects (those that were life-threatening, needed hospital care, or caused lasting problems or death) related to treatment and half the rate of severe side effects (those considered medically important by a person’s doctor; also called ‘Grade 3, 4, or 5’) related to treatment. What do the results of the study mean? Atezolizumab is now approved by the European Medicines Agency and can be used as a first treatment for people with advanced or metastatic NSCLC who aren’t able to receive platinum-based chemotherapy. This is an abstract of the Plain Language Summary of Publication article. View the full Plain Language Summary PDF of this article to read the full-text.

Future OncologyVol. 21(14)
Roche (Switzerland) (CH), University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (GB), Shanghai Jiao Tong University (CN), Royal Cornwall Hospital Trust (GB), Tata Memorial Hospital (IN), Cho Ray Hospital (VN), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CH), Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital (CN), Shanghai Chest Hospital (CN), Princess Margaret Cancer Centre (CA), University of Manchester (GB), University Hospital Regensburg (DE), Polytechnic University of San Luis Potosí (MX), Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo (BR), Hospital Universitario Virgen Macarena (ES), Institut Català d'Oncologia (ES), The Christie NHS Foundation Trust (GB), LungenClinic Grosshansdorf (DE), Duran i Reynals Hospital (ES), Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo (BR), CRUK Lung Cancer Centre of Excellence (GB), The Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology (PL), Istituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IT), University College London (GB), University of Milano-Bicocca (IT)
Pfizer, AstraZeneca, F. Hoffmann-La Roche, Cancer Research UK, University College London, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, CRUK Lung Cancer Centre of Excellence
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 82%
Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.