Disciplinary barriers need communication: a behavioral and fNIRS study under group decision-making paradigm shift based on cabin design

In the field of interdisciplinary engineering design, the terminology used by decision-makers from different disciplinary backgrounds often exhibits significant disciplinary heterogeneity, resulting in misunderstandings or communication barriers for decision-making teams. Due to the ambiguity of cognitive structures, the impact of interdisciplinary knowledge on decision-making quality and cognitive load was poorly answered. This study, grounded in utility theory and multi-criteria decision theory, introduced an enhanced multi-attribute decision-making task (MADM-LGD) to research the behavioral characteristics of decision-making groups and the cognitive shifts that occur during interdisciplinary decision-making paradigm transitions. An experiment utilizing Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy (fNIRS) was conducted based on a ship cabin design task, aiming to explore the neural mechanisms underlying interdisciplinary group decision-making. The analysis of experiment revealed several key findings: (1) Prior cognitive level does not significantly affect decision quality during the individual decision-making phase, but it positively influences decision quality during the group decision-making phase. (2) Interdisciplinary communication ability positively impacts decision quality. Hence, teams which exhibit stronger interdisciplinary communication achieve superior decision performance; (3) The task-oriented phase imposes a higher cognitive load compared to the non-task-oriented phase, while interdisciplinary communication helps alleviate this cognitive load, reducing the cognitive pressures associated with heterogeneous engineering semantics, promoting mutual understanding across disciplines, and ultimately enhancing decision quality. This study offers valuable guidance for advancing the empirical theories and practices of interdisciplinary group decision-making in artificial intelligence (AI) and human intelligence (HI).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Neuroscience
Published
2025-05-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2025.1594111
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Cognitive Science and Mapping
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.48

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Disciplinary barriers need communication: a behavioral and fNIRS study under group decision-making paradigm shift based on cabin design

Zuhua Jiang, Limei Wu, Kexin Cheng, Jiapeng Yang
1 citations
Frontiers in Neuroscience
Cognitive Science and Mapping
2.48
article

Disciplinary barriers need communication: a behavioral and fNIRS study under group decision-making paradigm shift based on cabin design

Zuhua Jiang, Limei Wu, Kexin Cheng, Jiapeng Yang
article en
1 citations

Abstract

In the field of interdisciplinary engineering design, the terminology used by decision-makers from different disciplinary backgrounds often exhibits significant disciplinary heterogeneity, resulting in misunderstandings or communication barriers for decision-making teams. Due to the ambiguity of cognitive structures, the impact of interdisciplinary knowledge on decision-making quality and cognitive load was poorly answered. This study, grounded in utility theory and multi-criteria decision theory, introduced an enhanced multi-attribute decision-making task (MADM-LGD) to research the behavioral characteristics of decision-making groups and the cognitive shifts that occur during interdisciplinary decision-making paradigm transitions. An experiment utilizing Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy (fNIRS) was conducted based on a ship cabin design task, aiming to explore the neural mechanisms underlying interdisciplinary group decision-making. The analysis of experiment revealed several key findings: (1) Prior cognitive level does not significantly affect decision quality during the individual decision-making phase, but it positively influences decision quality during the group decision-making phase. (2) Interdisciplinary communication ability positively impacts decision quality. Hence, teams which exhibit stronger interdisciplinary communication achieve superior decision performance; (3) The task-oriented phase imposes a higher cognitive load compared to the non-task-oriented phase, while interdisciplinary communication helps alleviate this cognitive load, reducing the cognitive pressures associated with heterogeneous engineering semantics, promoting mutual understanding across disciplines, and ultimately enhancing decision quality. This study offers valuable guidance for advancing the empirical theories and practices of interdisciplinary group decision-making in artificial intelligence (AI) and human intelligence (HI).

Frontiers in NeuroscienceVol. 19
Shanghai Jiao Tong University (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Cognitive Science and Mapping
2.48
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.