Chemical composition of Egyptian propolis and studying its antimicrobial activity and synergistic action with honey against some multidrug-resistant uropathogens

Urinary tract infection (UTI) is one of the most common infections worldwide, increasing the incidence of antibiotic resistance and creating demand for alternative antimicrobial agents. Propolis, a natural antimicrobial agent, has been used in ancient folk medicine. This study evaluates the effectiveness of ethanolic extract of propolis (EEP) alone and in combination with honey against multidrug-resistant (MDR) uropathogens and also investigates the chemical composition of Egyptian propolis, which may be a potential therapeutic approach against MDR uropathogens. EEP was prepared, followed by column chromatographic fractionation using four different solvent systems. The ethyl acetate fraction was further fractionated through vacuum liquid chromatography (VLC). The antimicrobial activity of the EEP, propolis fractions, honey, and EEP-Honey mixture was studied, and the fraction with the best antimicrobial activity was analyzed by GC-MS and HPLC. The results indicated that EEP showed antimicrobial activity against the five MDR uropathogens with varying potential, while honey showed no activity against these pathogens. In comparison, the EEP-Honey mixture exhibited good antimicrobial synergy, with the MIC value decreasing by approximately 4-8 folds. In propolis fractionation, ethyl acetate was the best solvent for extracting antimicrobial substances from EEP, and fraction 5 (F5) was the most active fraction, with inhibition zone diameters of 30.33, 29.00, 21.58, 25.33, and 27.67 mm against MDR P. aeruginosa, E. coli, K. pneumoniae, S. saprophyticus, and C. albicans, respectively. GC-MS analysis of the F5 fraction revealed the presence of phenolics, flavonoids, terpenoids, acids, and alkaloids. In addition, HPLC polyphenol analysis identified 14 phenolic acids and flavonoid compounds with concentrations ranging from 117.36 to 5657.66 µg/g. Overall, the current findings highlighted the promising antimicrobial synergy of the EEP-Honey mixture against MDR urinary pathogens. The phytochemical analysis of propolis also identified potential bioactive compounds responsible for its biological and pharmaceutical properties.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2025-05-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-00773-1
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Bee Products Chemical Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
10.03

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Chemical composition of Egyptian propolis and studying its antimicrobial activity and synergistic action with honey against some multidrug-resistant uropathogens

Marwa M. Abdel‐Aziz, Nagwa M. Sidkey, Asmaa Helmy, Atef A. El‐Hela
6 citations
Scientific Reports
Bee Products Chemical Analysis
10.03
article

Chemical composition of Egyptian propolis and studying its antimicrobial activity and synergistic action with honey against some multidrug-resistant uropathogens

Marwa M. Abdel‐Aziz, Nagwa M. Sidkey, Asmaa Helmy, Atef A. El‐Hela
article en
6 citations

Abstract

Urinary tract infection (UTI) is one of the most common infections worldwide, increasing the incidence of antibiotic resistance and creating demand for alternative antimicrobial agents. Propolis, a natural antimicrobial agent, has been used in ancient folk medicine. This study evaluates the effectiveness of ethanolic extract of propolis (EEP) alone and in combination with honey against multidrug-resistant (MDR) uropathogens and also investigates the chemical composition of Egyptian propolis, which may be a potential therapeutic approach against MDR uropathogens. EEP was prepared, followed by column chromatographic fractionation using four different solvent systems. The ethyl acetate fraction was further fractionated through vacuum liquid chromatography (VLC). The antimicrobial activity of the EEP, propolis fractions, honey, and EEP-Honey mixture was studied, and the fraction with the best antimicrobial activity was analyzed by GC-MS and HPLC. The results indicated that EEP showed antimicrobial activity against the five MDR uropathogens with varying potential, while honey showed no activity against these pathogens. In comparison, the EEP-Honey mixture exhibited good antimicrobial synergy, with the MIC value decreasing by approximately 4-8 folds. In propolis fractionation, ethyl acetate was the best solvent for extracting antimicrobial substances from EEP, and fraction 5 (F5) was the most active fraction, with inhibition zone diameters of 30.33, 29.00, 21.58, 25.33, and 27.67 mm against MDR P. aeruginosa, E. coli, K. pneumoniae, S. saprophyticus, and C. albicans, respectively. GC-MS analysis of the F5 fraction revealed the presence of phenolics, flavonoids, terpenoids, acids, and alkaloids. In addition, HPLC polyphenol analysis identified 14 phenolic acids and flavonoid compounds with concentrations ranging from 117.36 to 5657.66 µg/g. Overall, the current findings highlighted the promising antimicrobial synergy of the EEP-Honey mixture against MDR urinary pathogens. The phytochemical analysis of propolis also identified potential bioactive compounds responsible for its biological and pharmaceutical properties.

Scientific ReportsVol. 15(1)
Al-Azhar University (EG)
Cairo University, Science and Technology Development Fund, Al-Azhar University
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Bee Products Chemical Analysis
10.03
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.