A Minimal Annotation Pipeline for Deep Learning Segmentation of Skeletal Muscles

Translating quantitative skeletal muscle MRI biomarkers into clinics requires efficient automatic segmentation methods. The purpose of this work is to investigate a simple yet effective iterative methodology for building a high-quality automatic segmentation model while minimizing the manual annotation effort. We used a retrospective database of quantitative MRI examinations (n = 70) of healthy and pathological thighs for training a nnU-Net segmentation model. Healthy volunteers and patients with various neuromuscular diseases, broadly categorized as dystrophic, inflammatory, neurogenic, and unlabeled NMDs. We designed an iterative procedure, progressively adding cases to the training set and using a simple visual five-level rating scale to judge the validity of generated segmentations for clinical use. On an independent test set (n = 20), we assessed the quality of the segmentation in 13 individual thigh muscles using standard segmentation metrics-dice coefficient (DICE) and 95% Hausdorff distance (HD95)-and quantitative biomarkers-cross-sectional area (CSA), fat fraction (FF), and water-T1/T2. We obtained high-quality segmentations (DICE = 0.88 ± 0.15/0.86 ± 0.14, HD95 = 6.35 ± 12.33/6.74 ± 11.57 mm), comparable to recent works, although with a smaller training set (n = 30). Inter-rater agreement on the five-level scale was fair to moderate but showed progressive improvement of the segmentation model along with the iterations. We observed limited differences from manually delineated segmentations on the quantitative outcomes (MAD: CSA = 65.2 mm<sup>2</sup>, FF = 1%, water-T1 = 8.4 ms, water-T2 = 0.35 ms), with variability comparable to manual delineations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
NMR in Biomedicine
Published
2025-05-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/nbm.70066
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Nutrition and Health in Aging
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.33
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Minimal Annotation Pipeline for Deep Learning Segmentation of Skeletal Muscles

Olivier Scheidegger, Pierre‐Yves Baudin, Benjamin Marty, Harmen Reyngoudt et al.
2 citations
NMR in Biomedicine
Nutrition and Health in Aging
2.33
article

A Minimal Annotation Pipeline for Deep Learning Segmentation of Skeletal Muscles

Olivier Scheidegger, Pierre‐Yves Baudin, Benjamin Marty, Harmen Reyngoudt, Jean‐Marc Boisserie, Fabian Balsiger, L. Beck, Sophie Jouan
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Translating quantitative skeletal muscle MRI biomarkers into clinics requires efficient automatic segmentation methods. The purpose of this work is to investigate a simple yet effective iterative methodology for building a high-quality automatic segmentation model while minimizing the manual annotation effort. We used a retrospective database of quantitative MRI examinations (n = 70) of healthy and pathological thighs for training a nnU-Net segmentation model. Healthy volunteers and patients with various neuromuscular diseases, broadly categorized as dystrophic, inflammatory, neurogenic, and unlabeled NMDs. We designed an iterative procedure, progressively adding cases to the training set and using a simple visual five-level rating scale to judge the validity of generated segmentations for clinical use. On an independent test set (n = 20), we assessed the quality of the segmentation in 13 individual thigh muscles using standard segmentation metrics-dice coefficient (DICE) and 95% Hausdorff distance (HD95)-and quantitative biomarkers-cross-sectional area (CSA), fat fraction (FF), and water-T1/T2. We obtained high-quality segmentations (DICE = 0.88 ± 0.15/0.86 ± 0.14, HD95 = 6.35 ± 12.33/6.74 ± 11.57 mm), comparable to recent works, although with a smaller training set (n = 30). Inter-rater agreement on the five-level scale was fair to moderate but showed progressive improvement of the segmentation model along with the iterations. We observed limited differences from manually delineated segmentations on the quantitative outcomes (MAD: CSA = 65.2 mm<sup>2</sup>, FF = 1%, water-T1 = 8.4 ms, water-T2 = 0.35 ms), with variability comparable to manual delineations.

NMR in BiomedicineVol. 38(7)
University of Bern (CH), University Hospital of Bern (CH), Institut de Myologie (FR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Nutrition and Health in Aging
2.33
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.