Enhancing forest biodiversity indicators in inventories through harmonized protocols

Forest biodiversity is a multifaceted term encompassing tree and shrub diversity and the diversity of other life forms such as animals or fungi. Extensive forest monitoring networks such as National Forest Inventories or the International Co-operative Programme on Assessment and Monitoring of Air Pollution Effects on Forest plots have implemented biodiversity-monitoring protocols to satisfy increasing information demands. However, these protocols often evaluate biodiversity through potential biodiversity indicators (e.g., stand structure and deadwood), which may not provide sufficient information on other aspects of the current forest biodiversity status. In this study, we present the forest biodiversity monitoring results and lessons from a cross-country study to support large-scale monitoring systems. We developed, evaluated, and discussed harmonized protocols, mainly focused on birds and mammals, which extend beyond the traditional features captured in large-scale forest inventories. We leverage information from 30 intensively monitored plots established in six European countries to achieve these goals. The protocols were helpful in recording data that could be used to reproduce biodiversity-related attributes such as measures of forest structure, regeneration, deadwood features, and bird and mammal diversity. Specifically, field data on trees was used to describe structural features of forests such as stand composition and forest complexity. In contrast, composition and regeneration data provided helpful information for other biodiversity indicators. Data gathering to monitor bird and mammal diversity requires revisiting the plots, which involves greater economic investment and human effort. Once the bird and mammal data have been collected, advanced algorithms could facilitate and enhance the efficiency of the analyses. To optimize the monitoring efficiency, we recommend including these two new biodiversity assessments in a subset of extensive survey plots. Furthermore, using standard guidelines for these new assessments across all countries would facilitate the comparison and reporting of statistical data.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
iForest - Biogeosciences and Forestry
Published
2025-05-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3832/ifor4778-018
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Forest Management and Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.21

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Enhancing forest biodiversity indicators in inventories through harmonized protocols

Mitja Skudnik, Francesca Giannetti, Giovanni D’Amico, Ross T. Shackleton et al.
2 citations
iForest - Biogeosciences and Forestry
Forest Management and Policy
2.21
article

Enhancing forest biodiversity indicators in inventories through harmonized protocols

Mitja Skudnik, Francesca Giannetti, Giovanni D’Amico, Ross T. Shackleton, Stefano Puliti, Johannes Breidenbach, Isabel Cañellas, Marco Ferretti, Sylvia Schnell, Icíar Alberdi, Gherardo Chirici, Daniel Moreno‐Fernández
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Forest biodiversity is a multifaceted term encompassing tree and shrub diversity and the diversity of other life forms such as animals or fungi. Extensive forest monitoring networks such as National Forest Inventories or the International Co-operative Programme on Assessment and Monitoring of Air Pollution Effects on Forest plots have implemented biodiversity-monitoring protocols to satisfy increasing information demands. However, these protocols often evaluate biodiversity through potential biodiversity indicators (e.g., stand structure and deadwood), which may not provide sufficient information on other aspects of the current forest biodiversity status. In this study, we present the forest biodiversity monitoring results and lessons from a cross-country study to support large-scale monitoring systems. We developed, evaluated, and discussed harmonized protocols, mainly focused on birds and mammals, which extend beyond the traditional features captured in large-scale forest inventories. We leverage information from 30 intensively monitored plots established in six European countries to achieve these goals. The protocols were helpful in recording data that could be used to reproduce biodiversity-related attributes such as measures of forest structure, regeneration, deadwood features, and bird and mammal diversity. Specifically, field data on trees was used to describe structural features of forests such as stand composition and forest complexity. In contrast, composition and regeneration data provided helpful information for other biodiversity indicators. Data gathering to monitor bird and mammal diversity requires revisiting the plots, which involves greater economic investment and human effort. Once the bird and mammal data have been collected, advanced algorithms could facilitate and enhance the efficiency of the analyses. To optimize the monitoring efficiency, we recommend including these two new biodiversity assessments in a subset of extensive survey plots. Furthermore, using standard guidelines for these new assessments across all countries would facilitate the comparison and reporting of statistical data.

iForest - Biogeosciences and ForestryVol. 18(3)
Instituto Nacional de Investigación y Tecnología Agraria y Alimentaria, European Commission, HORIZON EUROPE Framework Programme
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Forest Management and Policy
2.21
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.