Reducing Building Energy Performance Gap: Integrating Agent-Based Modelling and Building Performance Simulation

The building energy performance gap (BEPG) remains a significant challenge, undermining the accuracy of energy simulations and complicating efforts to design energy-efficient buildings. This study addresses this issue by developing an adaptive occupant behaviour framework for office buildings, integrating agent-based modelling (ABM) with a building performance simulation (BPS) platform. Conventional BPS models often rely on deterministic assumptions and overlook the dynamic, stochastic nature of occupant interactions, such as window and blind operations. By incorporating occupant-driven behaviours, this research enhances the realism of energy predictions and provides insights into reducing the BEPG. Focusing on a multi-functional office building at the University of Nottingham, the study used empirical data to validate the model. The ABM framework simulated occupant behaviours influenced by factors like indoor and outdoor temperatures, solar radiation, clothing levels, and metabolic rates. Profiles generated by the ABM were integrated into the energy model, creating an Adjust model compared against a Base model with deterministic settings. Validation against measured boiler energy use showed that the Baseline model over-predicted consumption by roughly 45 %, whereas the behaviour-informed Adjust model cut the deviation to about 26 %, albeit under-predicting the total load. Statistical analyses revealed improvements in mean squared error (MSE) and root mean squared error (RMSE), although hourly energy predictions remained a challenge. Additionally, the Adjust model provided a more realistic representation of thermal comfort, reducing variability in the predicted mean vote (PMV) index from extreme values in the Base model to a more stable range in the Adjust model. However, the Adjust model also predicted higher indoor CO2 concentrations, particularly in individual offices, due to reduced ventilation associated with occupant actions. This study demonstrates the potential of integrating ABM with BPS models to address modelling discrepancies by capturing detailed and dynamic occupant interactions, emphasising the importance of adaptive behaviours in improving prediction accuracy and occupant well-being.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Buildings
Published
2025-05-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15101728
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Building Energy and Comfort Optimization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.03
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reducing Building Energy Performance Gap: Integrating Agent-Based Modelling and Building Performance Simulation

John Kaiser Calautit, Ching-Shoei Chiang
5 citations
Buildings
Building Energy and Comfort Optimization
5.03
article

Reducing Building Energy Performance Gap: Integrating Agent-Based Modelling and Building Performance Simulation

John Kaiser Calautit, Ching-Shoei Chiang
article en
5 citations

Abstract

The building energy performance gap (BEPG) remains a significant challenge, undermining the accuracy of energy simulations and complicating efforts to design energy-efficient buildings. This study addresses this issue by developing an adaptive occupant behaviour framework for office buildings, integrating agent-based modelling (ABM) with a building performance simulation (BPS) platform. Conventional BPS models often rely on deterministic assumptions and overlook the dynamic, stochastic nature of occupant interactions, such as window and blind operations. By incorporating occupant-driven behaviours, this research enhances the realism of energy predictions and provides insights into reducing the BEPG. Focusing on a multi-functional office building at the University of Nottingham, the study used empirical data to validate the model. The ABM framework simulated occupant behaviours influenced by factors like indoor and outdoor temperatures, solar radiation, clothing levels, and metabolic rates. Profiles generated by the ABM were integrated into the energy model, creating an Adjust model compared against a Base model with deterministic settings. Validation against measured boiler energy use showed that the Baseline model over-predicted consumption by roughly 45 %, whereas the behaviour-informed Adjust model cut the deviation to about 26 %, albeit under-predicting the total load. Statistical analyses revealed improvements in mean squared error (MSE) and root mean squared error (RMSE), although hourly energy predictions remained a challenge. Additionally, the Adjust model provided a more realistic representation of thermal comfort, reducing variability in the predicted mean vote (PMV) index from extreme values in the Base model to a more stable range in the Adjust model. However, the Adjust model also predicted higher indoor CO2 concentrations, particularly in individual offices, due to reduced ventilation associated with occupant actions. This study demonstrates the potential of integrating ABM with BPS models to address modelling discrepancies by capturing detailed and dynamic occupant interactions, emphasising the importance of adaptive behaviours in improving prediction accuracy and occupant well-being.

BuildingsVol. 15(10)
University of Nottingham (GB), University College London (GB)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Building Energy and Comfort Optimization
5.03
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.