Cross-Cultural Adaptation And Psychometric Validation Of The Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (Lifetime/Recent- Clinical Version) Into Bangla

Background: Suicidal behavior, including ideation, attempts, and non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI), represents a major public health challenge globally, particularly in low- and middle-income countries like Bangladesh. Despite the widespread use of the Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) for suicide risk assessment, a validated Bangla version of the C-SSRS Lifetime/Recent - Clinical version is currently lacking.Aim of the study: To translate, culturally adapt, and validate the Bangla version of the Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) Lifetime/Recent – Clinical version for the assessment of suicidal ideation and behaviors in Bangladeshi adolescents and adults. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted from October 2021 to September 2023 at the Department of Psychiatry, BSMMU, Dhaka, Bangladesh, enrolling 201 participants aged ≥13 years using purposive sampling. A rigorous forward–backward translation procedure was employed. Content validity was evaluated through expert review. Construct validity was assessed via exploratory factor analysis, and convergent validity was tested by correlating C-SSRS scores with Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II) scores. Internal consistency was measured using Cronbach’s alpha, and predictive accuracy was assessed through sensitivity and specificity analysis.Result: The sample included adolescents (50.2%) and adults (49.8%) with and without suicidal behavior. Content validity indices (I-CVI) were ≥0.83 for all items. Factor analyses supported the structural validity of the scale, with acceptable variance explained across subscales: severity (61.85–69.93%), intensity (53.76–73.93%), and behavior (41.93–47.9%). Cronbach’s alpha values ranged from 0.523 to 0.76 across subscales and age groups. Convergent validity was stronger for recent (past one-month) suicidal ideation and intensity (r = 0.686 and r = 0.406, p < 0.01) compared to lifetime measures. Sensitivity for detecting suicidal behaviors was high (92.9%–100%), while specificity ranged from 18.3% to 40%.Conclusion: The Bangla version of the C-SSRS Lifetime/Recent – Clinical version is a reliable, valid, and culturally appropriate tool for assessing suicidal ideation and behavior among both adolescents and adults in Bangladesh. Its use may significantly enhance suicide prevention efforts in clinical and research settings.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
South Eastern European Journal of Public Health
Published
2025-05-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.70135/seejph.vi.6407
Primary Topic
Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cross-Cultural Adaptation And Psychometric Validation Of The Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (Lifetime/Recent- Clinical Version) Into Bangla

M.J. Rahman
South Eastern European Journal of Public Health
Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
article

Cross-Cultural Adaptation And Psychometric Validation Of The Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (Lifetime/Recent- Clinical Version) Into Bangla

M.J. Rahman
article en

Abstract

Background: Suicidal behavior, including ideation, attempts, and non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI), represents a major public health challenge globally, particularly in low- and middle-income countries like Bangladesh. Despite the widespread use of the Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) for suicide risk assessment, a validated Bangla version of the C-SSRS Lifetime/Recent - Clinical version is currently lacking.Aim of the study: To translate, culturally adapt, and validate the Bangla version of the Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) Lifetime/Recent – Clinical version for the assessment of suicidal ideation and behaviors in Bangladeshi adolescents and adults. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted from October 2021 to September 2023 at the Department of Psychiatry, BSMMU, Dhaka, Bangladesh, enrolling 201 participants aged ≥13 years using purposive sampling. A rigorous forward–backward translation procedure was employed. Content validity was evaluated through expert review. Construct validity was assessed via exploratory factor analysis, and convergent validity was tested by correlating C-SSRS scores with Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II) scores. Internal consistency was measured using Cronbach’s alpha, and predictive accuracy was assessed through sensitivity and specificity analysis.Result: The sample included adolescents (50.2%) and adults (49.8%) with and without suicidal behavior. Content validity indices (I-CVI) were ≥0.83 for all items. Factor analyses supported the structural validity of the scale, with acceptable variance explained across subscales: severity (61.85–69.93%), intensity (53.76–73.93%), and behavior (41.93–47.9%). Cronbach’s alpha values ranged from 0.523 to 0.76 across subscales and age groups. Convergent validity was stronger for recent (past one-month) suicidal ideation and intensity (r = 0.686 and r = 0.406, p < 0.01) compared to lifetime measures. Sensitivity for detecting suicidal behaviors was high (92.9%–100%), while specificity ranged from 18.3% to 40%.Conclusion: The Bangla version of the C-SSRS Lifetime/Recent – Clinical version is a reliable, valid, and culturally appropriate tool for assessing suicidal ideation and behavior among both adolescents and adults in Bangladesh. Its use may significantly enhance suicide prevention efforts in clinical and research settings.

South Eastern European Journal of Public Health
Openalex Percentile: Top 85%
Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.