Assessment of Prescribing Pattern of Cardiovascular Drugs: A Prospective Observational Study

Background: Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) contribute significantly to global morbidity and mortality, with 17.9 million deaths reported in 2019. Varied prescribing patterns of cardiovascular drugs among healthcare providers impact patient outcomes, emphasizing the need for rational drug use. Understanding these patterns is crucial for improving prescribing quality and medication safety. Methods: A prospective observational study was conducted at Navodaya Medical College Hospital and Research Centre, Raichur, Karnataka, spanning three months. Data from 82 cardiovascular patients were collected through consecutive sampling. The study assessed patient demographics, distribution of cardiovascular emergencies, drug prescriptions, and clinical outcomes. Prescribing indicators, including drug utilization trends, were analyzed to gauge the appropriateness of cardiovascular drug prescriptions. Results: Common cardiovascular emergencies included Myocardial Infarction (36.58%) and Unstable Angina (50%). Female patients represented a substantial portion across emergency categories (64.63%). Key drugs prescribed included Clopidogrel + Aspirin (80.49%), Aspirin (loading dose) (72%), and Atorvastatin (70%). Patient outcomes revealed high improvement rates for Myocardial Infarction (83.9%) and Unstable Angina (85%), with notable mortality. WHO prescribing indicators highlighted a 3.73 ± 1.1 average drugs per encounter, 40% generic drug prescriptions, and adherence to 75.89% of Essential Drug List recommendations. Conclusion: The study provides valuable insights into cardiovascular drug prescribing patterns in a specific healthcare setting. While Myocardial Infarction and Unstable Angina predominate, a mortality rate underscores the complexity of cardiovascular emergency management. Gender-specific considerations and adherence to essential drugs are notable findings. Future research should target factors influencing mortality, aiming to optimize cardiovascular emergency care on a broader scale.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical Research
Published
2025-05-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.52711/2231-5691.2025.00018
Primary Topic
Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessment of Prescribing Pattern of Cardiovascular Drugs: A Prospective Observational Study

Shankarappa M Mudgal, Friedemann Paul, Sudhir Kumar, Anne Davis
Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical Research
Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy
article

Assessment of Prescribing Pattern of Cardiovascular Drugs: A Prospective Observational Study

Shankarappa M Mudgal, Friedemann Paul, Sudhir Kumar, Anne Davis
article en

Abstract

Background: Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) contribute significantly to global morbidity and mortality, with 17.9 million deaths reported in 2019. Varied prescribing patterns of cardiovascular drugs among healthcare providers impact patient outcomes, emphasizing the need for rational drug use. Understanding these patterns is crucial for improving prescribing quality and medication safety. Methods: A prospective observational study was conducted at Navodaya Medical College Hospital and Research Centre, Raichur, Karnataka, spanning three months. Data from 82 cardiovascular patients were collected through consecutive sampling. The study assessed patient demographics, distribution of cardiovascular emergencies, drug prescriptions, and clinical outcomes. Prescribing indicators, including drug utilization trends, were analyzed to gauge the appropriateness of cardiovascular drug prescriptions. Results: Common cardiovascular emergencies included Myocardial Infarction (36.58%) and Unstable Angina (50%). Female patients represented a substantial portion across emergency categories (64.63%). Key drugs prescribed included Clopidogrel + Aspirin (80.49%), Aspirin (loading dose) (72%), and Atorvastatin (70%). Patient outcomes revealed high improvement rates for Myocardial Infarction (83.9%) and Unstable Angina (85%), with notable mortality. WHO prescribing indicators highlighted a 3.73 ± 1.1 average drugs per encounter, 40% generic drug prescriptions, and adherence to 75.89% of Essential Drug List recommendations. Conclusion: The study provides valuable insights into cardiovascular drug prescribing patterns in a specific healthcare setting. While Myocardial Infarction and Unstable Angina predominate, a mortality rate underscores the complexity of cardiovascular emergency management. Gender-specific considerations and adherence to essential drugs are notable findings. Future research should target factors influencing mortality, aiming to optimize cardiovascular emergency care on a broader scale.

Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical Research
Navodaya Dental College and Hospital (IN), University of Agricultural Sciences Raichur (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 84%
Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.