Novel Potent and Selective Dopamine D4 Receptor Piperidine Antagonists as Potential Alternatives for the Treatment of Glioblastoma

<b>Background/Objectives</b>: D4R antagonists have recently been suggested as potential therapeutic alternatives to the standard treatments of glioblastoma (GBM). In this study, new piperidine-based ligands, analogs of the potent and selective D4R compounds 77-LH-28-1 (<b>7</b>) and its 4-benzyl analog <b>8</b>, were synthesized and studied to investigate the effects produced by variations in the distances between the pharmacophoric features on the D4R affinity and selectivity. <b>Methods</b>: All the new compounds <b>9-20</b> were evaluated for their radioligand binding affinity at D2-like receptor subtypes and the results were rationalized by docking studies and molecular dynamics (MD) simulations. The functional profiles of the most interesting derivatives were assessed at D4R Go and Gi protein and β-arrestin by BRET assay and their potential anticancer activity was determined in GBM cell lines. <b>Results</b>: Radioligand binding results highlighted that the derivatives bearing a terminal butyl chain showed structure-activity relationships different from those with a benzyl terminal. From functional studies performed on the best derivatives <b>12</b> and <b>16</b>, the response profiles of both compounds were more robust in antagonist mode, with derivative <b>16</b> showing higher antagonist potency than <b>12</b> across all three transducers. Interestingly, <b>12</b> and <b>16</b> dose-dependently decreased the cell viability of GBM cells, inducing cell death and cell cycle arrest, promoting an increase in ROS production, causing mitochondrial dysfunction, and significantly inhibiting colony formation. <b>Conclusions</b>: The promising biological profiles of <b>12</b> and <b>16</b> make them new lead candidates that warrant further investigation to gain a better understanding of the mechanism behind their antitumor activity and better evaluate their potential for GBM treatment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Pharmaceuticals
Published
2025-05-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/ph18050739
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.22

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Novel Potent and Selective Dopamine D4 Receptor Piperidine Antagonists as Potential Alternatives for the Treatment of Glioblastoma

Valerio Mammoli, Loredana Cappellacci, Alessandro Bonifazi, Fabio Del Bello et al.
4 citations
Pharmaceuticals
Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling
3.22
article

Novel Potent and Selective Dopamine D4 Receptor Piperidine Antagonists as Potential Alternatives for the Treatment of Glioblastoma

Valerio Mammoli, Loredana Cappellacci, Alessandro Bonifazi, Fabio Del Bello, Giulio Vistoli, Consuelo Amantini, Laura Zeppa, Wilma Quaglia, Pegi Pavletić, Gianfabio Giorgioni, A. Piergentili, Hideaki Yano, Riccardo Petrelli, Emanuela Sabato, Alessandro Piergentili, Federica Matteucci, Rian Garland
article en
4 citations

Abstract

<b>Background/Objectives</b>: D4R antagonists have recently been suggested as potential therapeutic alternatives to the standard treatments of glioblastoma (GBM). In this study, new piperidine-based ligands, analogs of the potent and selective D4R compounds 77-LH-28-1 (<b>7</b>) and its 4-benzyl analog <b>8</b>, were synthesized and studied to investigate the effects produced by variations in the distances between the pharmacophoric features on the D4R affinity and selectivity. <b>Methods</b>: All the new compounds <b>9-20</b> were evaluated for their radioligand binding affinity at D2-like receptor subtypes and the results were rationalized by docking studies and molecular dynamics (MD) simulations. The functional profiles of the most interesting derivatives were assessed at D4R Go and Gi protein and β-arrestin by BRET assay and their potential anticancer activity was determined in GBM cell lines. <b>Results</b>: Radioligand binding results highlighted that the derivatives bearing a terminal butyl chain showed structure-activity relationships different from those with a benzyl terminal. From functional studies performed on the best derivatives <b>12</b> and <b>16</b>, the response profiles of both compounds were more robust in antagonist mode, with derivative <b>16</b> showing higher antagonist potency than <b>12</b> across all three transducers. Interestingly, <b>12</b> and <b>16</b> dose-dependently decreased the cell viability of GBM cells, inducing cell death and cell cycle arrest, promoting an increase in ROS production, causing mitochondrial dysfunction, and significantly inhibiting colony formation. <b>Conclusions</b>: The promising biological profiles of <b>12</b> and <b>16</b> make them new lead candidates that warrant further investigation to gain a better understanding of the mechanism behind their antitumor activity and better evaluate their potential for GBM treatment.

PharmaceuticalsVol. 18(5)
Università di Camerino (IT), Northeastern University (US), University of Rijeka (HR), University of Milan (IT), Aptuit (Italy) (IT), The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston (US)
Università degli Studi di Camerino, National Institutes of Health, National Institute on Drug Abuse
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling
3.22
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.