Comparing modern machine learning approaches and different forecast strategies on Grand Slam tennis tournaments

In this article, different modern machine learning and regression approaches for modeling and prediction of tennis matches in Grand Slam tournaments are investigated. Our data include information on 5013 matches in men's ssGrand Slam tournaments from the period 2011 to 2022. The investigated methods focus on modeling the probability of the first-named player to win the respective match. Moreover, different features are considered including the players' age, the ATP ranking and points, bookmakers' odds, Elo rating, and two additional age variables, which take into account the optimal age of a tennis player. We compare the different regression approaches to modern machine learning approaches with respect to various performance measures. Moreover, we also investigate different forecast strategies. First of all, a cross-validation-type strategy for all matches between 2011 and 2021. We also use an “expanding window” strategy by continuously updating the training data to analyze the predictive performance of the approaches on the tournaments from 2022. Finally, a “rolling window” strategy is used with only 3 years of tournaments as training data. We then select small subsets of best models with largest average ranks and investigate those in more detail by the help of interpretable machine learning techniques.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Sports Analytics
Published
2025-05-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/22150218251338954
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Sports Analytics and Performance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.13
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparing modern machine learning approaches and different forecast strategies on Grand Slam tennis tournaments

Alexander Gerharz, Andreas Groll, N. Buhamra
1 citations
Journal of Sports Analytics
Sports Analytics and Performance
3.13
article

Comparing modern machine learning approaches and different forecast strategies on Grand Slam tennis tournaments

Alexander Gerharz, Andreas Groll, N. Buhamra
article en
1 citations

Abstract

In this article, different modern machine learning and regression approaches for modeling and prediction of tennis matches in Grand Slam tournaments are investigated. Our data include information on 5013 matches in men's ssGrand Slam tournaments from the period 2011 to 2022. The investigated methods focus on modeling the probability of the first-named player to win the respective match. Moreover, different features are considered including the players' age, the ATP ranking and points, bookmakers' odds, Elo rating, and two additional age variables, which take into account the optimal age of a tennis player. We compare the different regression approaches to modern machine learning approaches with respect to various performance measures. Moreover, we also investigate different forecast strategies. First of all, a cross-validation-type strategy for all matches between 2011 and 2021. We also use an “expanding window” strategy by continuously updating the training data to analyze the predictive performance of the approaches on the tournaments from 2022. Finally, a “rolling window” strategy is used with only 3 years of tournaments as training data. We then select small subsets of best models with largest average ranks and investigate those in more detail by the help of interpretable machine learning techniques.

Journal of Sports AnalyticsVol. 11
TU Dortmund University (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Sports Analytics and Performance
3.13
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.