Modeling Academic Social Networks Using Covering and Matching in Intuitionistic Fuzzy Influence Graphs

Influence graphs are essential tools for analyzing interactions and relationships in social networks. However, real-world networks often involve uncertainty due to incomplete, vague, or dynamic information. The structure of influence graphs often exhibits natural symmetries, which play a crucial role in optimizing covering and matching strategies by decreasing redundancy and enhancing efficiency. Traditional influence graph models struggle to address such complexities. To address this gap, we present the novel concepts of covering and matching in intuitionistic fuzzy influence graphs (IFIGs) for modeling academic social networks. These graphs incorporate degrees of membership and non-membership to better reflect uncertainty in influence patterns. Thus, the main aim of this study is to initiate the concepts of covering and matching within the IFIG paradigm and provide its application in social networks. Initially, we establish some basic terms related to covering and matching with illustrative examples. We also investigate complete and complete bipartite IFIGs. To verify the practicality of this study, student interactions across subjects are analyzed using strong paths and strong independent sets. The proposed model is then evaluated using the TOPSIS method to rank participants based on their influence. Moreover, a comparative study is conducted to demonstrate that the proposed model not only handles uncertainty effectively but also performs better than the existing approaches.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Symmetry
Published
2025-05-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/sym17050785
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Multi-Criteria Decision Making
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.21
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Modeling Academic Social Networks Using Covering and Matching in Intuitionistic Fuzzy Influence Graphs

Waheed Ahmad Khan, Hai Van Pham, Yusra Arooj
2 citations
Symmetry
Multi-Criteria Decision Making
4.21
article

Modeling Academic Social Networks Using Covering and Matching in Intuitionistic Fuzzy Influence Graphs

Waheed Ahmad Khan, Hai Van Pham, Yusra Arooj
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Influence graphs are essential tools for analyzing interactions and relationships in social networks. However, real-world networks often involve uncertainty due to incomplete, vague, or dynamic information. The structure of influence graphs often exhibits natural symmetries, which play a crucial role in optimizing covering and matching strategies by decreasing redundancy and enhancing efficiency. Traditional influence graph models struggle to address such complexities. To address this gap, we present the novel concepts of covering and matching in intuitionistic fuzzy influence graphs (IFIGs) for modeling academic social networks. These graphs incorporate degrees of membership and non-membership to better reflect uncertainty in influence patterns. Thus, the main aim of this study is to initiate the concepts of covering and matching within the IFIG paradigm and provide its application in social networks. Initially, we establish some basic terms related to covering and matching with illustrative examples. We also investigate complete and complete bipartite IFIGs. To verify the practicality of this study, student interactions across subjects are analyzed using strong paths and strong independent sets. The proposed model is then evaluated using the TOPSIS method to rank participants based on their influence. Moreover, a comparative study is conducted to demonstrate that the proposed model not only handles uncertainty effectively but also performs better than the existing approaches.

SymmetryVol. 17(5)
University of Okara (PK), University of Education (PK), Hanoi University of Science and Technology (VN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Multi-Criteria Decision Making
4.21
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.