Cardiac magnetic resonance feature tracking evaluates left atrial strain in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus and mitral regurgitation

PurposeTo explore left atrial (LA) function in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and mitral regurgitation assessed by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging feature tracking (MRI-FT).MethodIn this study, 64 SLE patients (35.0 ± 12.3 years, 49 females) and 50 age- and gender-matched healthy controls (32.1 ± 11.2 years, 32 females) were analyzed. Patients with SLE were further classified into two subgroups according to mitral regurgitation defined by echocardiography: mitral regurgitation subgroup (<i>n</i> = 32) and non-mitral regurgitation subgroup (<i>n</i> = 32). All subjects underwent cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) examination and SLE patients underwent extra laboratory testing. LA volume and strain parameters were compared among the three groups, and a correlation analysis was further performed between CMR parameters and clinical variables.ResultsPatients in both mitral regurgitation and non-mitral regurgitation subgroups showed higher LAVmin (29.15 ± 7.5, 26.22 ± 8.23 vs 21.68 ± 7.67, <i>p</i> = .003, .026) and LAVimin (17.44,14.9 vs 12.62, <i>p</i> = .002,.046) than healthy control subjects. Abnormal LA reservoir, conduit and bump strain were also observed in SLE patients (all <i>p</i> < .05), with more severe reservoir (<i>p</i> = .006, .031) and bump strain (<i>p</i> = .01, .033) abnormality found in mitral regurgitation subgroup. In the SLE group, LA reservoir, bump and conduit strain were significantly positively correlated with LVEF (B = 0.467, <i>p</i> < .001 vs B = 0.019, <i>p</i> = .01 vs B = 0.168, <i>p</i> = .001 vs B = 0.036, <i>p</i> < .001 vs B = 0.020, <i>p</i> = .024). Conduit strain (εe, SRe) was positively correlated with LAEF (B = 0.229, <i>p</i> = .032 vs B = 0.027, <i>p</i> = .008).ConclusionMRI-FT based LA parameters may be considered a helpful tool to evaluate LA function in SLE patients, and LA strain may indicate severity of the cardiac dysfunction in SLE patients.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Lupus
Published
2025-05-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/09612033251344983
Primary Topic
Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cardiac magnetic resonance feature tracking evaluates left atrial strain in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus and mitral regurgitation

Jianhua Dong, Long Jiang Zhang, Song Luo, Weiwei Huang et al.
1 links
Lupus
Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Research
article

Cardiac magnetic resonance feature tracking evaluates left atrial strain in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus and mitral regurgitation

Jianhua Dong, Long Jiang Zhang, Song Luo, Weiwei Huang, Weiqiang Dou, Jun Zhang, Jingxin Wang, Yan Ma, Bin Wang, Weixin Hu, Lingyan Zhang, Li Qi
article en

Abstract

PurposeTo explore left atrial (LA) function in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and mitral regurgitation assessed by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging feature tracking (MRI-FT).MethodIn this study, 64 SLE patients (35.0 ± 12.3 years, 49 females) and 50 age- and gender-matched healthy controls (32.1 ± 11.2 years, 32 females) were analyzed. Patients with SLE were further classified into two subgroups according to mitral regurgitation defined by echocardiography: mitral regurgitation subgroup (<i>n</i> = 32) and non-mitral regurgitation subgroup (<i>n</i> = 32). All subjects underwent cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) examination and SLE patients underwent extra laboratory testing. LA volume and strain parameters were compared among the three groups, and a correlation analysis was further performed between CMR parameters and clinical variables.ResultsPatients in both mitral regurgitation and non-mitral regurgitation subgroups showed higher LAVmin (29.15 ± 7.5, 26.22 ± 8.23 vs 21.68 ± 7.67, <i>p</i> = .003, .026) and LAVimin (17.44,14.9 vs 12.62, <i>p</i> = .002,.046) than healthy control subjects. Abnormal LA reservoir, conduit and bump strain were also observed in SLE patients (all <i>p</i> < .05), with more severe reservoir (<i>p</i> = .006, .031) and bump strain (<i>p</i> = .01, .033) abnormality found in mitral regurgitation subgroup. In the SLE group, LA reservoir, bump and conduit strain were significantly positively correlated with LVEF (B = 0.467, <i>p</i> < .001 vs B = 0.019, <i>p</i> = .01 vs B = 0.168, <i>p</i> = .001 vs B = 0.036, <i>p</i> < .001 vs B = 0.020, <i>p</i> = .024). Conduit strain (εe, SRe) was positively correlated with LAEF (B = 0.229, <i>p</i> = .032 vs B = 0.027, <i>p</i> = .008).ConclusionMRI-FT based LA parameters may be considered a helpful tool to evaluate LA function in SLE patients, and LA strain may indicate severity of the cardiac dysfunction in SLE patients.

LupusVol. 34(8)
Nanjing General Hospital of Nanjing Military Command (CN), Nanjing University (CN)
National Key Research and Development Program of China
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.