Comparative Analysis of Machine Learning and Deep Learning Models for LULC Classification using Remote Sensing Data

Objectives: The primary objective of this study is to evaluate and compare the performance of machine learning and deep learning models for Land Use and Land Cover (LULC) classification using remote sensing data. Specifically, it assesses Support Vector Machine (SVM), XGBoost, an ensemble model (SVM + XGBoost), and a Deep Neural Network (DNN) on pre-processed hyperspectral datasets (Pavia University, Indian Pines) and raw satellite imagery from the Twin Cities of Odisha, India. Method: The study follows a systematic workflow, including data acquisition, preprocessing using Principal Component Analysis (PCA), and classification using machine learning and deep learning models. The models are evaluated based on Overall Accuracy (OA), Kappa Index, Precision, Recall, and F1-score. Statistical significance is tested using the Nemenyi post hoc test to determine the superiority of the proposed ensemble model over individual classifiers. Findings: The ensemble model (SVM + XGBoost) achieved the highest classification accuracy across all datasets: 95.4% for Pavia University, 88.7% for Indian Pines, and 93.6% for the Twin Cities of Odisha. The statistical analysis confirms that the ensemble model performs significantly better than XGBoost with a 95% confidence interval. The DNN model also demonstrated competitive performance but was slightly outperformed by the ensemble approach. Novelty: This study presents a comparative performance analysis of machine learning and deep learning models for LULC classification, demonstrating the effectiveness of an ensemble-based approach in improving classification accuracy. Unlike previous works, the study validates findings using real-world satellite data, applies statistical significance testing, and offers quantitative performance comparisons with existing literature, contributing to more accurate and scalable LULC classification methodologies. Keywords: Remote Sensing, LULC, Machine Learning, Deep Neural Network, XGBoost

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Indian Journal of Science and Technology
Published
2025-05-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17485/ijst/v18i18.104
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Remote Sensing and Land Use
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.60
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Analysis of Machine Learning and Deep Learning Models for LULC Classification using Remote Sensing Data

Vidya Mohanty, Dayal Kumar Behera, Amiya Ranjan Panda, Subhra Swetanisha
2 citations
Indian Journal of Science and Technology
Remote Sensing and Land Use
2.60
article

Comparative Analysis of Machine Learning and Deep Learning Models for LULC Classification using Remote Sensing Data

Vidya Mohanty, Dayal Kumar Behera, Amiya Ranjan Panda, Subhra Swetanisha
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Objectives: The primary objective of this study is to evaluate and compare the performance of machine learning and deep learning models for Land Use and Land Cover (LULC) classification using remote sensing data. Specifically, it assesses Support Vector Machine (SVM), XGBoost, an ensemble model (SVM + XGBoost), and a Deep Neural Network (DNN) on pre-processed hyperspectral datasets (Pavia University, Indian Pines) and raw satellite imagery from the Twin Cities of Odisha, India. Method: The study follows a systematic workflow, including data acquisition, preprocessing using Principal Component Analysis (PCA), and classification using machine learning and deep learning models. The models are evaluated based on Overall Accuracy (OA), Kappa Index, Precision, Recall, and F1-score. Statistical significance is tested using the Nemenyi post hoc test to determine the superiority of the proposed ensemble model over individual classifiers. Findings: The ensemble model (SVM + XGBoost) achieved the highest classification accuracy across all datasets: 95.4% for Pavia University, 88.7% for Indian Pines, and 93.6% for the Twin Cities of Odisha. The statistical analysis confirms that the ensemble model performs significantly better than XGBoost with a 95% confidence interval. The DNN model also demonstrated competitive performance but was slightly outperformed by the ensemble approach. Novelty: This study presents a comparative performance analysis of machine learning and deep learning models for LULC classification, demonstrating the effectiveness of an ensemble-based approach in improving classification accuracy. Unlike previous works, the study validates findings using real-world satellite data, applies statistical significance testing, and offers quantitative performance comparisons with existing literature, contributing to more accurate and scalable LULC classification methodologies. Keywords: Remote Sensing, LULC, Machine Learning, Deep Neural Network, XGBoost

Indian Journal of Science and TechnologyVol. 18(18)
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Remote Sensing and Land Use
2.60
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Comparative Analysis of Machine Learning and Deep Learning Models for LULC Classification using Remote Sensing Data — Vidya Mohanty, Dayal Kumar Behera, et al. · Indian Journal of Science and Technology (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS