What a Human-Centred Approach Reveals About Disinformation Policies: The Baltic Case

The Baltic countries’ responses to disinformation are widely recognized for their effectiveness in balancing “hard” and “soft” approaches while upholding democratic values (Bleyer-Simon et al., 2024). This article argues for additional efforts and more focused approaches to sustain societal resilience amid increasing geopolitical uncertainties and national political and economic risks, resulting in challenges of a more “epistemic character,” such as growing information-related vulnerabilities, informational inequalities, and polarization. To expose inconsistencies and gaps in the current strategies and agendas for countering disinformation, the article proposes a human-centred approach based on the critical realist framework elaborated by Margareth Archer (1995, 2020). While Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania have advanced beyond mere risk awareness in their national policies, this article argues that a more targeted approach is necessary—one that goes beyond the protective logic of securitization and toward evidence-informed awareness of the divergences and information-related inequalities among people.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Media and Communication
Published
2025-05-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.9548
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Misinformation and Its Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.40
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

What a Human-Centred Approach Reveals About Disinformation Policies: The Baltic Case

Auksė Balčytienė, Agnese Dāvidsone, Andra Siibak
2 citations
Media and Communication
Misinformation and Its Impacts
8.40
article

What a Human-Centred Approach Reveals About Disinformation Policies: The Baltic Case

Auksė Balčytienė, Agnese Dāvidsone, Andra Siibak
article en
2 citations

Abstract

The Baltic countries’ responses to disinformation are widely recognized for their effectiveness in balancing “hard” and “soft” approaches while upholding democratic values (Bleyer-Simon et al., 2024). This article argues for additional efforts and more focused approaches to sustain societal resilience amid increasing geopolitical uncertainties and national political and economic risks, resulting in challenges of a more “epistemic character,” such as growing information-related vulnerabilities, informational inequalities, and polarization. To expose inconsistencies and gaps in the current strategies and agendas for countering disinformation, the article proposes a human-centred approach based on the critical realist framework elaborated by Margareth Archer (1995, 2020). While Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania have advanced beyond mere risk awareness in their national policies, this article argues that a more targeted approach is necessary—one that goes beyond the protective logic of securitization and toward evidence-informed awareness of the divergences and information-related inequalities among people.

Media and CommunicationVol. 13
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Misinformation and Its Impacts
8.40
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

What a Human-Centred Approach Reveals About Disinformation Policies: The Baltic Case — Auksė Balčytienė, Agnese Dāvidsone, et al. · Media and Communication (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS