Capacity Evaluation of Unequal-Leg Single-Angle Steel Compression Members using Indian and American Code Provisions

Objectives: This study aims to compare the design strength of eccentrically loaded unequal leg single angles under compression according to IS 800:1984, IS 800:2007, IS 800:2007 (Amendment 2), and AISC 360-22 Specifications for structural steel buildings. Methods: Spreadsheets were developed to evaluate the compression capacities of unequal single-angle sections using all these codes. The analysis focused on unequal leg single angle connected by either longer or shorter legs, under eccentric loading conditions. Findings: IS 800:2007 (Amendment 2) significantly enhances the compression strength of unequal leg single angles compared to IS 800:2007, with increases of up to 40% for angles fastened through the longer leg and up to 87% for those fastened through the shorter leg. Compared to the AISC 360-22 LRFD method, IS 800:2007 (Amendment 2) provides up to 184% more strength for angles fastened through the longer leg and up to 179% more for angles fastened through the shorter leg, While IS 800:2007 provides up to 112% more strength for angles connected by the longer leg and up to 68% more for those connected by the shorter leg. IS 800:1984 also shows increased strength over the AISC 360-22 ASD method, with up to 67% more strength for angles connected by the longer leg and 27% more for those attached by the shorter leg. Additionally, IS 800:2007 (Amendment 2) reveals that unequal leg single angles connected by the shorter leg provide up to 56% more compression strength than those connected by the longer leg. Novelty: This research compares the capacity predicted by the latest amendment of the Indian standard code for steel design with its previous versions and the American code, focusing on the design of unequal-legged single-angle compression members. It offers valuable insights into the capacity prediction and overall structural safety, and thereby the resulting economy in the choice of steel sections. An important insight from the study is that unequal leg single angles connected by the shorter leg exhibit greater compression strength than those connected by the longer leg. Keywords: Unequal legs, Eccentrically loaded, Single angles, Steel sections, Indian codes, American codes

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Indian Journal of Science and Technology
Published
2025-05-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17485/ijst/v18i18.402
Primary Topic
Structural Load-Bearing Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Capacity Evaluation of Unequal-Leg Single-Angle Steel Compression Members using Indian and American Code Provisions

A. B. Gaikwad
Indian Journal of Science and Technology
Structural Load-Bearing Analysis
article

Capacity Evaluation of Unequal-Leg Single-Angle Steel Compression Members using Indian and American Code Provisions

A. B. Gaikwad
article en

Abstract

Objectives: This study aims to compare the design strength of eccentrically loaded unequal leg single angles under compression according to IS 800:1984, IS 800:2007, IS 800:2007 (Amendment 2), and AISC 360-22 Specifications for structural steel buildings. Methods: Spreadsheets were developed to evaluate the compression capacities of unequal single-angle sections using all these codes. The analysis focused on unequal leg single angle connected by either longer or shorter legs, under eccentric loading conditions. Findings: IS 800:2007 (Amendment 2) significantly enhances the compression strength of unequal leg single angles compared to IS 800:2007, with increases of up to 40% for angles fastened through the longer leg and up to 87% for those fastened through the shorter leg. Compared to the AISC 360-22 LRFD method, IS 800:2007 (Amendment 2) provides up to 184% more strength for angles fastened through the longer leg and up to 179% more for angles fastened through the shorter leg, While IS 800:2007 provides up to 112% more strength for angles connected by the longer leg and up to 68% more for those connected by the shorter leg. IS 800:1984 also shows increased strength over the AISC 360-22 ASD method, with up to 67% more strength for angles connected by the longer leg and 27% more for those attached by the shorter leg. Additionally, IS 800:2007 (Amendment 2) reveals that unequal leg single angles connected by the shorter leg provide up to 56% more compression strength than those connected by the longer leg. Novelty: This research compares the capacity predicted by the latest amendment of the Indian standard code for steel design with its previous versions and the American code, focusing on the design of unequal-legged single-angle compression members. It offers valuable insights into the capacity prediction and overall structural safety, and thereby the resulting economy in the choice of steel sections. An important insight from the study is that unequal leg single angles connected by the shorter leg exhibit greater compression strength than those connected by the longer leg. Keywords: Unequal legs, Eccentrically loaded, Single angles, Steel sections, Indian codes, American codes

Indian Journal of Science and TechnologyVol. 18(18)
Openalex Percentile: Top 89%
Structural Load-Bearing Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.